07-05-2010, 02:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-05-2010, 02:04 PM by LsavedSmeD.)
(07-05-2010, 01:36 PM)Poffo Wrote: Hey everyone. I'm a long time reader, first time poster. Just thought I'd put my 2 cents into the mix to hopefully bring 4th some clarity.
Though this is getting slightly off topic, wouldn't it be reasonable to define STS and STO in the context of control vs. acceptance, as has been done before by Ra?
In this sense, STS is bent on control because it fears the acceptance of the real unity possible in the STO path, whereas STO strives to accept all (including all forms of products of fear) and does so based on it's love for all creation.
Indeed, there is a difference between the Logos as Love (2nd distortion of II) and the vibration of love (4th density/chakra). The former is the Creative Principle stemming from the 1st distortion (manifested by Light aka 3rd distortion) and the latter is a reflection of an act or way of being which we call love. So, both STS and STO beings actively love, even if that love is polarized predominantly towards self or other-self. As well, each entity regardless of polarity IS Love as a sub-Logos, not to mention the fact that all of Creation is Love.
I think much confusion has been caused over the difference between the specific use of the term "love". As is usually the case when I mediate in "real-life" discussions/arguments between others, both are right AND wrong and this is usually because each side is working from different understandings, and we all know that this is not the density of understanding
We now return to the regularly scheduled topic...
By the way, solitary, thanks for making my day with this:
Quote:The badinage has been fun, if orotund at times, gotta go.
Thank you for bringing clarity into the debate.
I was trying to convey that the creation is love, that was all. Love learning about love.
Namaste to you. Peace and love.