Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"

    Thread: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"


    Namaste (Offline)

    Follow your dreams
    Posts: 1,718
    Threads: 55
    Joined: Apr 2010
    #13
    07-07-2010, 05:36 AM (This post was last modified: 07-07-2010, 11:31 AM by Namaste.)
    (07-06-2010, 11:39 PM)Cyclops Wrote: So its a guess based on the excerpts I read which sums that it works kind of like this: rockness or rock has an infinite number of shapes/forms/vehicles/fields. All of these vehicles have a hierarchy which is increasingly intelligent going further and further up. Ra used thought to communicate with a higher up or more intelligent/balanced or how they said "Regular" vehicle of rock. So as they say in the excerpt above it can be thought to contact a higher intelligent or more well-tuned form or vehicle of rock which communicated to its lower self form that was already there, to transform.

    The way they described it filled me with wonder because if I see it a little correctly the entire creator is there even in the smallest of particles which if realized can be tapped into by the creator (Ra in this case). The request given from creator to the creator in the rock to assume a higher form "everlasting rock" by connecting the originally made rock to its infinite potential, just as in the excerpt above where they used to split it and move it as well. This is entirely an assumption which may be an incorrect interpretation of Ra's answer but I felt I'd give it a shot.

    This is along my thinking also, a point well put across. One could consider it a similar analogy to that of the varying 'health' of the human body. Some people are healthier - more aligned with source - than others, and yet, they share the same make-up.

    Another thing to contemplate regarding the hierarchical nature of energy - densities. One can only see densities that are current and lower to their own. There are many cases of spoon bending and telekinesis, which is third density thought effecting first density material (edit: thanks Gemini, typo), just as the case of the pyramids (rather the thoughts originated from sixth density).

    (07-06-2010, 11:59 PM)LsavedSmeD Wrote: This is very confusing but after reviewing more replies it seems to me that the evidence supports the proof of Ra actually creating the pyramid, I have had doubts but it just seems so mystical the pyramids - especially with the scientific data in relation to the Ra information.

    More responses would be nice as I still am completely confused on the matter.

    In what aspects are you confused brother? Perhaps some direct questions can help us attempt to fill in some gaps for you. There is another thread open which has some of the facts. Here are a few more...

    The pyramid is lined up exactly with the magnetic north pole, with a difference of only 16 minutes (there are 60 minutes in one degree). This is extreme accuracy, needing some kind of compass technology.

    Summer Solstice

    [Image: 2pyrs.gif]

    This is a photograph of the Great Pyramid of Giza and its neighbour, as seen from the sphinx on the evening of the summer solstice. The sun sets in the exact center of the two pyramids. For the Egyptians to be able to do this, they must have known the day of the summer solstice, and therefore must have known the exact length of the year (365.25). By calculating the size of the earths revolutions around the sun, the velocity it was travelling at, and the angle of its axis of rotation, the longest day of the year, and the length of the year, could be calculated. This astronomical information would have also been used to pin-point the placement of the pyramids in which to be built.

    On the day of the winter solstice from the view of the Great Pyramid, the sun rises to the left of the sphinx's head, traces the top of the head, and sets to the right. Again, this cannot be done by guesswork (one cannot create structures such as the pyramid and sphinx and then move tem left and right to align with these events), and implies very considered and mathematical planning.

    If you take the perimeter of the pyramid, and divide it by two times the height, you get the number pi (3.14159...) up to the fifteenth digit. The chances of this phenomenon happening by sheer chance is remarkably small. It was a number not calculated/documented accurately to the fourth digit until the 6th century. Again, this implies advanced mathematical knowledge.

    Although the sides of the base of the pyramid are some 757 feet long, it still forms an almost perfect square (every angle in the base is exactly 90 degrees, again only minutes off). Considering the scale of the pyramid, and it's age (think of how houses move over time due to earth movements), this is incredible accuracy.

    There is also the fact that although the Egyptians kept very careful records about everything they ever did, every king they had, every war they fought, and every structure they built, there were no records of them ever having built the pyramids. There are also no hieroglyphs in the pyramid itself.

    The pyramid is constructed of 2,300,000 blocks, weighing from 2 to 100 tonnes. Apparently, this rock was 'moved' over an entire mountain range, and through a dense forest, to the place the pyramids were built. If you took all of the stone used, and cut it into 1 foot square blocks, it would extend 2/3 around the earth.

    If you take the line of longitude that the pyramid lies on, and the latitude that the pyramid lies on, 31 degrees north, by 31 degrees west (this also holds significance), they are the two lines that cover the most combined land area in the world (in essence, the pyramid is the center of all of the land mass of the whole earth).

    The height of the pyramid (481 feet) is almost exactly 1/1,000,000,000 (one billionth) of the distance from the earth to the sun (480.6 billion feet).

    Even today, after thousands of years of weather battering the pyramid, the stones are placed so perfectly that one cannot slide a piece of paper in between them.

    A material and structural engineer, who specialises in creating near perfectly flat material (for high grade technology), took some measurements of the 100 tonne stones that construct the kings chamber. Using laser measurements, he found they were almost perfectly flat, to 1/1000th of an inch accuracy. No hand tool in the world can accomplish this.

    If you look at the pyramid from directly above, the exact center (tip of pyramid) is placed precisely over the exact center of the base, to about 1/4 of an inch. This alone is incredible due to the scale of the pyramid, and the fact it's constructed from 2,300,000 blocks. To finish with that kind of accuracy is something we cannot do today.

    Then there is the weight of the stones. Not only would they be impossible to place and lift without technology, how could a person cut the rock from the quarry? Think about it, any blade that was cutting under a large 100 tonne block would be impossible to move. It would be crushed.

    Ah yes, and they did this with copper :¬)

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 11:27 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:39 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 12:06 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 01:09 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 01:21 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 02:58 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 04:32 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:08 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Cyclops - 07-06-2010, 11:39 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:59 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:36 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-07-2010, 10:14 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 07:03 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 06:48 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-07-2010, 11:43 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Monica - 07-07-2010, 09:04 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-09-2010, 05:47 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-07-2010, 01:54 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode