Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"

    Thread: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"


    Namaste (Offline)

    Follow your dreams
    Posts: 1,718
    Threads: 55
    Joined: Apr 2010
    #19
    07-07-2010, 05:20 PM (This post was last modified: 07-07-2010, 05:40 PM by Namaste.)
    (07-07-2010, 10:14 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I thought spoons would be 1st Density, being metal.

    Typo - post updated - thanks.

    Quote:Because of Earth's precession, the changing of it's axis of orbit, wouldn't the sun be setting today in a different place than back some thousands of years? Or was it built to line up perfectly now rather than then?

    A very good question. The date of exact alignment could hold esoteric significance.

    Quote:The accuracy is quite astounding. With power of thought, I wonder if it was even possible to get absolute perfection to the subatomic level acrosss the whole pyramid? Or is this perfection in the pyramids now the best as our laws of physics will allow? Or maybe something about our free will, only going to certain amount of perfection, but no further.

    Ra mentioned it was done purposely, as to not be worshipped as the builders of a 'miraculous' pyramid.

    Quote:Questioner: This is rather trivial, but I was wondering why the pyramid was built with many blocks rather than creating the whole thing as one form created at once?

    Ra: I am Ra. There is a law which we believe to be one of the more significant primal distortions of the Law of One. That is the Law of Confusion. You have called this the Law of Free Will. We wished to make an healing machine, or time/space ratio complex which was as efficacious as possible. However, we did not desire to allow the mystery to be penetrated by the peoples in such a way that we became worshipped as builders of a miraculous pyramid. Thus it appears to be made, not thought.

    I would imagine, from this statement, that they could quite easily build a perfect structure.
    (07-07-2010, 01:01 PM)Pablísimo Wrote: Not only that, I had the great fortune last summer to go inside the Great Pyramid and into the King's Chamber. I cannot tell you what an incredible experience that was -- despite the probably quite true assertion by Ra that it is like a piano out of tune, the energy there was incredibly strong and palpable. I felt the spiritual vibrations there stronger than at any other place I have ever been on this planet (including in the very center of Stonehenge, which I would rank a distant second in terms of how being there made me feel.) I passed about 5 people on my way there and everyone was clearly deeply affected. Oddly enough, the energy and atmosphere there seemed to provoke utter terror in a few people that I passed on my way in, though others like myself were energized and only mildly apprehensive. There is simply no way anyone could ever convince me that that structure is not of supernatural (in conventional terms) origin and purpose.

    That is incredible, what an experience. I long to visit that place - how does one get to visit the Kings Chamber? Organised tours, or is it off limits to the public?

    Quote:What do you guys think about this? I wonder if perhaps they were only examining blocks from the Great Pyramid but had no reason to assume that the blocks would be different in the other two? That's just wild speculation of course, but it would be nice if that point could be clarified.

    I would find it VERY interesting indeed in the light of the Ra material if that "unnatural" composition were not found in the other two.

    It is pretty clear that the Great Pyramid stands alone in Ra's mind regarding construction by thought alone.

    From re-reading the article, the only mention of pyramids is by the article author, and not the geologist. This could be an oversight.

    This quote could be interpreted as supporting the GP as a different type...

    Quote:More startlingly, Barsoum and another of his graduate students, Aaron Sakulich, recently discovered the presence of silicon dioxide nanoscale spheres (with diameters only billionths of a meter across) in one of the samples.

    It would be very interesting to clarify this, I'll email the geologist if I can find a contact address.

    LSD: Yes, David Wilcock mentioned that in one of his presentations (it was either Awake and Aware, or 2012 Enigma). He states that the Great Pyramid is (was) used for charging both ascension and healing.

    There is also the Russian pyramid research studies...

    http://www.pyramidoflife.com/eng/tests_experiments.html

    http://www.gizapyramid.com/russian/research.htm

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 11:27 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:39 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 12:06 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 01:09 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 01:21 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 02:58 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 04:32 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:08 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Cyclops - 07-06-2010, 11:39 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:59 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:36 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-07-2010, 10:14 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 07:03 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 06:48 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-07-2010, 11:43 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Monica - 07-07-2010, 09:04 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-09-2010, 05:47 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-07-2010, 01:54 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode