Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?

    Thread: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #22
    07-09-2010, 09:08 PM (This post was last modified: 07-10-2010, 08:53 AM by unity100.)
    (07-09-2010, 07:01 PM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote:
    Quote:"There is great danger in the use of the will as the personality becomes stronger, for it may be used even subconsciously in ways reducing the polarity of the entity."

    A good reason not to offer potentially powerful knowledge or information to one who did not come by it through their own inner process of organic growth.

    if i approach this logically and in a philosophical manner i come up with this, despite in practice not agreeing with it for practical reasons :
    ...............

    information, blue light, needs to be shared, when asked. that is its nature and flow. just like how it is the nature of green ray, love, to be given openly. actually, that is the case with all rays in positive path.

    blue light, as with everything, belongs to infinite existence, us, as our totality as a whole. noone can, and actually should try to attempt being custodian of any information they are given. for, not only the information was not 'given' to anyone, but it was also not the entity that was given who 'discovered' that information. the information is there, because we, the infinite intelligence, the 'totality of the totalities of creation', allowed that influx to flow to wherever it was flowing towards through the given entity. it needs to be handed out without hampering, whenever the flow is up. doing otherwise, becomes a negative act, due to hampering of that particular energy center. (blue, indigo or any higher center actually. valid for all centers)

    but then again, an entity may not be preferring to share a certain kind of information with a certain entity or entities, because s/he may be thinking or feeling that those entities may misuse it, and s/he doesnt want to be a part of such an experiential episode. then the entity may appeal to his/her higher self, his/her totality, or directly to infinite intelligence for that. but, my suspicion is that, as with all serious choices in life, such a choice that would change the fate of the entity or other involved entities (in regard to the life experience of the entity in that particular universe) would require the entity be balanced and powerful in violet ray enough to be able to adapt to the new energy setup that is going to happen as a result of this (in regard to his/her own mind/body/spirit complex configuration), or, by having to clog the blue ray (due to the toll that would take on the balance of the entity due to clogging).

    but then again this would be too rare, since an entity that has such delicate flow of blue ray or higher ray energies would very rarely be in the 'wrong place' that s/he would come up against a situation in which the information s/he has would be 'stolen' by undesirable entities. because, having sufficient advancement to allow such delicate flow of information, would also happen simultaneously by having advanced wisdom, and all life and subconscious choices of entity would shape along accordingly. unless a huge twist of fate occurs, it becomes unlikely. and then, if such a huge twist of fate occurs, then, it means that it was meant to occur.

    any kind of imbalance, would need to be balanced by the use of blue ray in the balancing fashion on the other side, just like how it seems to happen regarding green ray, more or less. thus, just like how one is not trying to withhold love because it causes some negatively inclined individuals to get disgusted and go even more negative, one should also not withhold his/her blue light because the similar might happen, and information may be used for any 'undesirable' purpose.

    actually, in most cases, if the entity which is going to hear the advanced information is not advanced enough, all you would end up would be to make yourself appear like a fool in their eyes, or madman. and on the other hand, an entity which is sufficiently advanced enough to have sufficient higher chakra activity and power, and balance, would find other ways to get that information, if it is not given.
    i also would like to add that, many spiritual seekers would have no qualms in sharing information, due to not having advanced in their way because of the level of their dedication. for most it remains as a hobby.

    others who advance enough, seem to be soon integrating with any kind of higher aspect governing their evolution (higher self, totality, infinite intelligence, or any kind of societal complex, or any other kind of group), or groups aiding them, and therefore any kind of information flow ends up already pre-governed.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-05-2010, 09:36 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by JoshC - 07-06-2010, 02:12 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 03:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:47 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-06-2010, 01:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-06-2010, 02:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-06-2010, 07:57 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-07-2010, 10:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 06:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 12:15 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 06:31 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 06:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 08:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-08-2010, 11:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 07:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:08 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-12-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 11:09 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 11:10 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 12:49 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-13-2010, 09:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 12:35 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 11:20 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 09:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-10-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 09:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 12:36 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 05:42 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 01:15 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 03:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 03:51 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 05:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 05:45 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 09:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-16-2010, 12:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-16-2010, 12:18 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-14-2010, 10:48 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-15-2010, 01:33 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 02:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 03:58 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 04:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 04:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-15-2010, 05:04 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 05:10 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-15-2010, 06:16 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 11:54 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-16-2010, 05:52 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-16-2010, 11:07 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode