(09-25-2014, 08:36 AM)Guardian Wrote: Three things of interest
1. CDC whistleblowers are now admitting there is a link between mmr vax and autism
2. Almost all vaccines have a link to autoimmune diseases
3. My girlfriend, who rescues horses for a living, says that you cannot sell a horse who has had vaccinations to a meat factory. No indication as to why.
Now given these 3 factors, the question is - do I think I can handle a vaccine preventable illness if one were to hit me? Yup, without a doubt. Would my children? Yup, without a doubt. Other people and other people's children? Maybe, maybe not. It may sound selfish, but I don't think the risk of autoimmune disease is worth the potential benefit of other peoples convenience.
If a man runs up to you and says "if you push this button you have a 1 in a thousand chance of getting a lifelong autoimmune disease, but also a one in a thousand chance of saving someone's life". Would You push it? Not me, hell no.
Good points! That is exactly the conclusion I reached. The vaccines were way scarier than the diseases, in all cases except tetanus (and rabies for dogs and cats). Those were the only ones that showed a clear correlation to reduced disease, along with minimal risk for side effects. In all other cases, the risk for side effects was unacceptable, and effectiveness highly questionable.
(Unfortunately, one must special order a 'T' (tetanus only) vaccine. What they call 'tetanus' now is actually DT - tetanus with diptheria.)
And yes, who among us would knowingly put our own child at risk, to satisfy some ideology? That idea is absurd to anyone who has children. No sane parent sacrifices their own child. No one.
I will repeat again, the key point that seems to be getting missed:
Original CDC graphs showed decline in the diseases before the vaccines were introduced. Those graphs were doctored for propaganda pieces.
I wonder if anyone has viewed the videos I posted above? There is rich, substantial information there. CDC graphs were the most convincing to me. I saw those very same graphs 26 years ago.
(09-25-2014, 01:55 AM)Account1 Wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't know that using google is what qualified as an education.
Google is just a vehicle and therefore irrelevant. A discerning individual cross-references all sources and makes an intelligent, informed decision, rather than blindly believing a single source, whether that be a book, a website, a parent, a doctor, or the drug industry.