12-28-2014, 02:38 PM
First let me reintroduce myself as you don't see my name on these forums much. However, as you will note I have been around LLResearch for quite a while just hanging out and checking out posts.
As for a discussion between Carla/Jim and David that could be a touchy subject at least from what I have found from David supporters.
Knowing what I do about challenges, Carla would have been talking about issuing challenges to not-incarnated entities. Challenges designed to determine whether an entity (controller/personality) is following the right or left path (light or dark) is only effective against non-incarnate entities.
Being in physical allows a consciousness to override the requirement for adhering to a truthful response to properly constructed challenges. This is due to the conscious-self ego dominance of the physical personality and the veiling from conscious connection to ALL THAT IS. Because there is no alignment with the Universal concepts of required truthful response when properly challenged, challenges against Earth based human entities can't be relied upon.
If you want to compare David to Carla/Jim, it is my belief that the defining factor is going to be purity of intent. Carla and Jim have never been about "making a living" off of or out of spiritual growth while David on the other hand is all about ensuring that he generates enough income to live quite well off of spirituality.
You must consider that a mental focus on bringing in enough income to live on out of your spiritual growth will, without a doubt, open you to your own ego's ability to cloud your actions. You will then also have to admit that anything you would bring through from outside sources could and would most probably also be tainted by the same influences.
From my own experiences I have found David is sorely lacking in the area of properly vetting his incarnate sources and that definitely brings into question in my mind how much is he vetting his not-incarnate sources. This to me is a glaring deficiency on the part of David.
There are other factors that could be discussed about David that should cause anyone to not blindly accept everything that David or anyone else has to say.
As for L/L Research, from the very beginnings of its work it has maintained proper skepticism and vetting procedures. The information that was brought through from Ra was compliant with the Law of Confusion but yet has held to be valid over time.
Each of us because of the Law of Confusion and the aspects of free will must come to our own decisions. However, we were granted by Creator with the ability to use logical reasoning in developing those decisions and it is up to us to use that gift in the highest and best manner.
As for a discussion between Carla/Jim and David that could be a touchy subject at least from what I have found from David supporters.
Knowing what I do about challenges, Carla would have been talking about issuing challenges to not-incarnated entities. Challenges designed to determine whether an entity (controller/personality) is following the right or left path (light or dark) is only effective against non-incarnate entities.
Being in physical allows a consciousness to override the requirement for adhering to a truthful response to properly constructed challenges. This is due to the conscious-self ego dominance of the physical personality and the veiling from conscious connection to ALL THAT IS. Because there is no alignment with the Universal concepts of required truthful response when properly challenged, challenges against Earth based human entities can't be relied upon.
If you want to compare David to Carla/Jim, it is my belief that the defining factor is going to be purity of intent. Carla and Jim have never been about "making a living" off of or out of spiritual growth while David on the other hand is all about ensuring that he generates enough income to live quite well off of spirituality.
You must consider that a mental focus on bringing in enough income to live on out of your spiritual growth will, without a doubt, open you to your own ego's ability to cloud your actions. You will then also have to admit that anything you would bring through from outside sources could and would most probably also be tainted by the same influences.
From my own experiences I have found David is sorely lacking in the area of properly vetting his incarnate sources and that definitely brings into question in my mind how much is he vetting his not-incarnate sources. This to me is a glaring deficiency on the part of David.
There are other factors that could be discussed about David that should cause anyone to not blindly accept everything that David or anyone else has to say.
As for L/L Research, from the very beginnings of its work it has maintained proper skepticism and vetting procedures. The information that was brought through from Ra was compliant with the Law of Confusion but yet has held to be valid over time.
Each of us because of the Law of Confusion and the aspects of free will must come to our own decisions. However, we were granted by Creator with the ability to use logical reasoning in developing those decisions and it is up to us to use that gift in the highest and best manner.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)