01-19-2015, 03:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2015, 10:04 AM by Enyiah.
Edit Reason: expanding view
)
I was not comfortable with my reply to this thread 2 weeks ago. In 3D thinking I cannot find an acceptable (to me) explanation to the aformentionned ''to serve the self is to serve all''. As I was reading along in Book 2, I came across this passage:
''30.1
QUESTIONER: I am going to make a statement and then let you correct it if I have made any errors. This is the statement: Creation is a single entity or unity. If only a single entity exists, then the only concept of service is service to self. If this single entity subdivides, then the concept of service of one of its parts to the other part is born. From this concept springs the equality of service to self or to others. It would seem that as the Logos subdivided, parts would select each orientation. As individualized entities emerge in space/time then I would assume that they have polarity. Is this statement correct?
RA: I am Ra. This statement is quite perceptive and correct until the final phrase in which we note that the polarities begin to be explored only at the point when a third-density entity becomes aware of the possibility of choice between the concept or distortion of service to self or service to others. This marks the end of what you may call the unselfconscious or innocent phase of conscious awareness.''
Put into this context I can see the reason behind the words.
''30.1
QUESTIONER: I am going to make a statement and then let you correct it if I have made any errors. This is the statement: Creation is a single entity or unity. If only a single entity exists, then the only concept of service is service to self. If this single entity subdivides, then the concept of service of one of its parts to the other part is born. From this concept springs the equality of service to self or to others. It would seem that as the Logos subdivided, parts would select each orientation. As individualized entities emerge in space/time then I would assume that they have polarity. Is this statement correct?
RA: I am Ra. This statement is quite perceptive and correct until the final phrase in which we note that the polarities begin to be explored only at the point when a third-density entity becomes aware of the possibility of choice between the concept or distortion of service to self or service to others. This marks the end of what you may call the unselfconscious or innocent phase of conscious awareness.''
Put into this context I can see the reason behind the words.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)