01-20-2015, 04:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2015, 08:12 PM by dreamliner.)
The interpretation of those percentages by "The Law of One study guide v2" might be the distorted version of the reality. It also omits that "mysterious 35%" mentioned in session 16.27 above. Confusion is better than distortion, in my opinion.
That guide both interprets those percentages as "intersections" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecti..._theory%29 ), and sums them alltogether & ends up with 86% (as in above). However, in my calculation, I assumed those percentages as "normalized" or lean figures, not intersections. In order to be able to sum all those percentages together, those percentages must be "normalized" or lean. That is, in 3rd density percentage there should not be any other density included.
On the other hand, how can "3rd density, 2nd density and 1st density percentages" be isolated from each other, as these densities exist/work together. 3D is dependant on 2D and 1D. We don't know exaclty whether 4D is dependant on 2D and 1D, but we know for sure that 4D is not dependant on 3D, that is 4D can both coexist with 3D and exist without 3D (earth will be a 1D+2D+4D planet for some time). Higher densities also aren't quite certain with regard to their dependancies/flexibilites. Can a planet be 1D+2D+3D+5D, or 1D+2D+4D+5D, or 1D+5D+6D. The Law of One series only contain Venus and Earth as examples.
Therefore, at least we can conclude that, it would be erroneous to sum 1D, 2D and 3D percentages together. Because 3D percentage, %27, contains 1D and 2D percentages as well. As a result, assuming that the 4D and 5D percentages do not contain any other density;
27% + 16% + 6% = 49%
which leaves quite a room for that mysterious 35%.
In this calculation, 4D and 5D percentages might also need to be corrected by subtracting other densities' intersections (which seems as can't be done with the existing data at hand). For example, I didn't check but I guess Venus was a 4D/5D planet in the past and now is a 5D/6D planet (although there are no 6D inhabitants), and earth will be a 1D+2D+4D planet for some time in future (which means there might be many other similar planets out there affecting the percentages spoken).
That guide both interprets those percentages as "intersections" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersecti..._theory%29 ), and sums them alltogether & ends up with 86% (as in above). However, in my calculation, I assumed those percentages as "normalized" or lean figures, not intersections. In order to be able to sum all those percentages together, those percentages must be "normalized" or lean. That is, in 3rd density percentage there should not be any other density included.
On the other hand, how can "3rd density, 2nd density and 1st density percentages" be isolated from each other, as these densities exist/work together. 3D is dependant on 2D and 1D. We don't know exaclty whether 4D is dependant on 2D and 1D, but we know for sure that 4D is not dependant on 3D, that is 4D can both coexist with 3D and exist without 3D (earth will be a 1D+2D+4D planet for some time). Higher densities also aren't quite certain with regard to their dependancies/flexibilites. Can a planet be 1D+2D+3D+5D, or 1D+2D+4D+5D, or 1D+5D+6D. The Law of One series only contain Venus and Earth as examples.
Therefore, at least we can conclude that, it would be erroneous to sum 1D, 2D and 3D percentages together. Because 3D percentage, %27, contains 1D and 2D percentages as well. As a result, assuming that the 4D and 5D percentages do not contain any other density;
27% + 16% + 6% = 49%
which leaves quite a room for that mysterious 35%.
In this calculation, 4D and 5D percentages might also need to be corrected by subtracting other densities' intersections (which seems as can't be done with the existing data at hand). For example, I didn't check but I guess Venus was a 4D/5D planet in the past and now is a 5D/6D planet (although there are no 6D inhabitants), and earth will be a 1D+2D+4D planet for some time in future (which means there might be many other similar planets out there affecting the percentages spoken).