01-21-2015, 11:08 AM
Great post, Icaro. Indeed I've found my own understanding of Ra's words deepen and evolve in accordance with my own evolution. The words seemed fixed, but they point to and reveal new layers of understanding as the self recognizes more of it self.
But if we weren't utterly reliant on language... say if a group were able to channel Ra without necessity of language (in fourth-density conditions), the perceptions received would probably make the Ra Contact words with which we're currently familiar seem a dust castle.
I believe that both the L/L group and Ra were mindful that this wasn't strictly a personal and private conversation - they knew they were undertaking this on a "public" stage, as it were, and thus geared their conversation more or less for the benefit of listening others, but I nevertheless love your thought regarding eavesdropping.
That idea does shed light on the relationship of every reader (outside of Don, Carla, and Jim) to this information -- the conversation was indeed, at heart, universal, but also, like you note, intensely personal. A different questioner and different L/L group would have yielded a very different Ra Contact, not different in essence but in form, direction, and quantity/quality/type of content examined.
But if we weren't utterly reliant on language... say if a group were able to channel Ra without necessity of language (in fourth-density conditions), the perceptions received would probably make the Ra Contact words with which we're currently familiar seem a dust castle.
(01-19-2015, 12:05 AM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: It's probably also worth noting, that even though we are reading the Ra Material online 30 years later, and it is a public document, the actual nature of its genesis was intensely personal. That is, unlike a movie that is made to be seen by millions of people, this dialogue or conversation was between the Ra group and the Questioner. The answers given were as universal as possible, and Don queried as to general principles, but at heart, this communications was a one-to-one personal chat.
So even though we are eavesdropping, and trying to learn directly from this document, it was essentially a teaching method between a 6d group and those 3 entities who drove the seeking process.
I believe that both the L/L group and Ra were mindful that this wasn't strictly a personal and private conversation - they knew they were undertaking this on a "public" stage, as it were, and thus geared their conversation more or less for the benefit of listening others, but I nevertheless love your thought regarding eavesdropping.
That idea does shed light on the relationship of every reader (outside of Don, Carla, and Jim) to this information -- the conversation was indeed, at heart, universal, but also, like you note, intensely personal. A different questioner and different L/L group would have yielded a very different Ra Contact, not different in essence but in form, direction, and quantity/quality/type of content examined.
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi