You're right Jesus would probably not hold a belief system that justified warfare, but Jesus is hardly the only example of a positively polarized entity in the Law of One books.
Consider General Patton:
"This entity polarized somewhat towards the positive in its incarnation due to its singleness of belief in truth and beauty. This entity was quite sensitive. It felt a great honor/duty to the preservation of that which was felt by the entity to be true, beautiful, and in need of defense. This entity perceived itself as a gallant figure. It polarized somewhat towards the negative in its lack of understanding the green ray it carried with it, rejecting the forgiveness principle which is implicit in universal love.
The sum total of this incarnation vibrationally was a slight increase in positive polarity but a decrease in harvestability due to the rejection of the Law or Way of Responsibility; that is, seeing universal love, yet still it fought on."
Here we have a career warrior who was nonetheless considered by Ra to be positively polarized and to have increased in positive polarization (though decreased in harvestablity) during a life which hinged on warfare.
Historically Mohammed was originally against the use of warfare to spread Islam, but after struggling against the persecution of Muslims by the Pagan peoples of the Arabian Peninsula, he allowed himself to be convinced by his followers that they should reclaim their homes in Mecca, from which they had been exiled for their beliefs.
Here's the quote from the Qu'Ran:
"Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
That is the entirety of his military career, all other military campaigns to spread Islam occurred after his death.
You are correct, that quote about Moses could easily apply to Mohammad as well, they were put in similar positions. Do you consider Moses to have been Service-to-self oriented?
Consider General Patton:
"This entity polarized somewhat towards the positive in its incarnation due to its singleness of belief in truth and beauty. This entity was quite sensitive. It felt a great honor/duty to the preservation of that which was felt by the entity to be true, beautiful, and in need of defense. This entity perceived itself as a gallant figure. It polarized somewhat towards the negative in its lack of understanding the green ray it carried with it, rejecting the forgiveness principle which is implicit in universal love.
The sum total of this incarnation vibrationally was a slight increase in positive polarity but a decrease in harvestability due to the rejection of the Law or Way of Responsibility; that is, seeing universal love, yet still it fought on."
Here we have a career warrior who was nonetheless considered by Ra to be positively polarized and to have increased in positive polarization (though decreased in harvestablity) during a life which hinged on warfare.
Historically Mohammed was originally against the use of warfare to spread Islam, but after struggling against the persecution of Muslims by the Pagan peoples of the Arabian Peninsula, he allowed himself to be convinced by his followers that they should reclaim their homes in Mecca, from which they had been exiled for their beliefs.
Here's the quote from the Qu'Ran:
"Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against because they have been wronged -truly Allah has the power to come to their support- those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, 'Our Lord is Allah'..." (Quran, 22:39-40)"
That is the entirety of his military career, all other military campaigns to spread Islam occurred after his death.
You are correct, that quote about Moses could easily apply to Mohammad as well, they were put in similar positions. Do you consider Moses to have been Service-to-self oriented?