To Vaccinate or Not

[Parsons]

Q: Do you feel that no-one should be vaccinated?

To answer that, I need to explain my understanding of disease:

34.7 ↥ Questioner: Do what we call contagious diseases play any part in this process with respect to the unmanifested self?
Ra: I am Ra. These so-called contagious diseases are those entities of second density which offer an opportunity for this type of catalyst. If this catalyst is unneeded, then these second-density creatures, as you would call them, do not have an effect. In each of these generalizations you may please note that there are anomalies so that we cannot speak to every circumstance but only to the general run or way of things as you experience them.

---

76.20 ▶ Questioner: What was the form of disease, and why did this exist at beginning third density?
Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, that which you speak of as disease is a functional portion of the body complex which offers the body complex the opportunity to cease viability. This is a desirable body complex function. The second portion of the answer has to do with second-density other-selves of a microscopic, as you would call it, size which have in some forms long existed and perform their service by aiding the physical body complex in its function of ceasing viability at the appropriate space/time.

76.21 ▶ Questioner: What I am trying to understand is the difference between the plan of the Logos for these second-density entities and the generation of what I would guess to be a more or less runaway array of feedback to create various physical problems that act as catalyst in our present third-density condition. Could you give me an indication of that; of whether my thinking is anywhere near right on that?
Ra: I am Ra. [...] The Logos planned for entities of mind/body/spirit complex to gain experience until the amount of experience was sufficient for an incarnation. This varied only slightly from second-density entities whose mind/body complexes existed for the purpose of experiencing growth and seeking consciousness. As the third density upon your planet proceeded, as has been discussed, the need for the physical body complex to cease became more rapidly approached due to intensified and more rapidly gained catalyst. This catalyst was not being properly assimilated. Therefore, the, shall we say, lifetimes needed to be shorter that learning might continue to occur with the proper rhythm and increment. Thus more and more opportunities have been offered as your density has progressed for disease.[...]

Also, the healer does not heal. In this case, the healer would be the doctor administering the vaccination or the doctor who created the vaccination.

Questioner: What is the difference, philosophically, between a mind/body/spirit complex healing itself through mental, shall I say, configuration or it being healed by an healer?
Ra: I am Ra. You have a misconception. The healer does not heal. The crystallized healer is a channel for intelligent energy which offers an opportunity to an entity that it might heal itself.

In no case is there an other description of healing. Therefore, there is no difference as long as the healer never approaches one whose request for aid has not come to it previously. This is also true of the more conventional healers of your culture and if these healers could but fully realize that they are responsible only for offering the opportunity of healing, and not for the healing, many of these entities would feel an enormous load of misconceived responsibility fall from them.

I think this is the perfect example of conventional healers having misconceived responsibility for those who have disease.

My own personal policy on disease is that it will simply NOT HAPPEN if it is not needed catalyst. That applies to myself (if I get sick and/or die) and everyone else. So I choose not to get vaccinated because as far as I'm concerned, I will either get sick with or without the vaccine if I need it, or if I don't I wont get sick either way. Consequently, it is also my belief that if I were to physically spread a disease to someone else whether or not I actually get sick, the same policy applies to the other person: If they don't need it, they won't get sick.

I have other concerns with vaccines but honestly, they aren't even worth mentioning because my primary reasoning stands without my other reservations.

Q: What DO you feel we should do to combat lethal and life-threatening diseases?

To answer you question directly, due to my above reasoning, the only way I think we can combat disease is to help the individual figure out why they need that catalyst. If the catalyst is no longer needed, they will no longer be sick / die of their disease.

I am NOT asking you or anyone to have that policy. If you want to try to encourage people to get vaccinated and think that it makes a difference, go right ahead. If other people want to get vaccinated or DON'T want to get vaccinated, I say do whatever floats your boat. However, I will not be coerced/guilt-ed into getting a vaccination (because of my reasoning above).