03-01-2015, 03:13 PM
I just read that it was the 85th anniversary of Don Elkins' birth.
Thanks goes to him, Jim and Carla for being trailblazers and cutting through the 90% bunk of New Age narcissism and profiteering.
The Ra Material is really worthy of being taught at university but perhaps will be during the 4th density of this planet in whatever educational settings are provided.
Anybody want to volunteer for another tour of duty and teach in early 4D? I'm almost tempted but I'll pass. I sense that there's alot of quality young people who are qualified to carry on the teaching role.
Here's a session about these deep thinking young people who would benefit from a philosophical treatment and presentation of the Ra Material -- just my opinion.
Q. We have many atheists and agnostics among our population.
They ask puzzling questions such as: "Does the creation require a creator?' or 'Could our universe have arisen without design, intent or purpose?' or 'Why not an eternally existing universe without a creator versus an eternally existing creator?'
Our philosophers ask 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'
They question the so-called First Cause, 'Who created the Creator...and who created the One who created the Creator...and who created the One that created the One that created the Creator...?' What is the rationale for this infinite regression?
We are perplexed and befuddled by these questions, but they appear valid and worthy of addressing.
In your 3rd density experience did you ponder these questions and if so how did you resolve them through your panentheism or All-One-Theism?
A. We surmise a plurality of ontological questions from you that require an overview approach.
To your last question, we did indeed ponder these same questions during our 3rd density experience. We had our share of atheists and agnostics who dared to ask the tough questions which would force much philosophical and theological debate. Many of these atheists and agnostics were sincere humanists who easily graduated to our 4th density but then continued the debate while free of the velvet fog of veiled consciousness.
One of these antagonists was our quasi-pandeist Albert Einstein who asked 'What I want to know is whether God had any choice in the creation of the Universe.' In other words, does the Creator have free will to choose to come into being or not come into being?
This was an appealing question because it encompassed your philosopher's questions of 'Why something rather than nothing?' and First Cause -- both which address the issue of choice.
We feel that the First Cause was an Absolute Determinism whereby primal Non-Beingness must emerge into Beingness -- primal Non-Existence must emerge into Existence -- primal Nothingness must emerge into Somethingness. Our IUP asserts that primal Infinity must emerge into Unity.
This Absolute Invariant Determinism was the Original Thought that predicated a fixed, constant deterministic choice -- one that is invariant and necessary and infused with awareness and purpose.
This Determinism, by definition predicated 'laws', 'maxims', 'principles', etc whereby from this Absolute Invariance emerges Absolute Variance or the Free Will Principle. As the initial counter-reaction to Invariance or Constancy it is natural that this principle is by definition the 1st Variation and is infused with awareness and will.
The natural counter-reaction to this 1st Variation or Free Will Principle is to revert back to Absolute Invariance or Absolute Constancy -- a return to the Source that is infused with awareness, inspiration and deep affection and is called the Love Principle and is the 2nd Variation.
The alternating reciprocation between Free Will and Love -- called the Free Will/Determinism Dynamic -- generates primal Vibration and results in the 3rd Variation called the Light Principle which is infused with awareness and desire to manifest -- to Being and Becoming -- by which the Creator experiences Itself.
So, as you can see, the Original Thought of Absolute Determinism begets the Primal Triad and its triadic nature begets the Dynamic Hexad and a Creation of infinite richness.
To summarize, the Creator had no choice but to come into being and to desire to experience Itself through All-One-Theism so that it can pursue the mystery of the Original Thought of Determinism and Purpose.
Q. It is fascinating to consider how determinism plays such a key role. Is it a fair statement to say that this kind of determinism transcends the rather mundane scientific kind of mechanistic determinism?
A. Yes, this is quite so.
Q. Is it also fair to say that in a very fundamental sense, that Determinism needs Free Will and the converse that Free Will needs Determinism?
A. For Creation to manifest and the Creator to have Being this is of, may we say, sublime necessity, and sublime necessity is expressed by the concept of the Logos which has been called the divine ordering principle of Creation which is infused with awareness, purpose and inspiration and thus the spiritual aspect of the Mythos/Topos/Logos Triad.
Q. I think we will call this a session before my head explodes! Just kidding...this was most illuminating and we plan to visit a few nearby universities and present this session to philosophy students and others in a colloquium setting.
We feel that your material is of the clarity and profundity of your Plato and Aristotle and other philosophical luminaries and is worthy of exposition to the academic mainstream. We have a support staff who are more than ready to create Power Point presentations and go on tour to universities and engage in discussion and Q & A's with students.
Do you feel that this is a sound decision and worthwhile effort?
A. We, as always, appeal to Free Will and wish you well in your efforts. We do feel that your younger generation of students are a receptive population who are ever curious and ever questioning, so be prepared for an adventurous ride with the caveat that it is okay to plead ignorance of deep questions -- as any honest expositor would do.
Thanks goes to him, Jim and Carla for being trailblazers and cutting through the 90% bunk of New Age narcissism and profiteering.
The Ra Material is really worthy of being taught at university but perhaps will be during the 4th density of this planet in whatever educational settings are provided.
Anybody want to volunteer for another tour of duty and teach in early 4D? I'm almost tempted but I'll pass. I sense that there's alot of quality young people who are qualified to carry on the teaching role.
Here's a session about these deep thinking young people who would benefit from a philosophical treatment and presentation of the Ra Material -- just my opinion.
Q. We have many atheists and agnostics among our population.
They ask puzzling questions such as: "Does the creation require a creator?' or 'Could our universe have arisen without design, intent or purpose?' or 'Why not an eternally existing universe without a creator versus an eternally existing creator?'
Our philosophers ask 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'
They question the so-called First Cause, 'Who created the Creator...and who created the One who created the Creator...and who created the One that created the One that created the Creator...?' What is the rationale for this infinite regression?
We are perplexed and befuddled by these questions, but they appear valid and worthy of addressing.
In your 3rd density experience did you ponder these questions and if so how did you resolve them through your panentheism or All-One-Theism?
A. We surmise a plurality of ontological questions from you that require an overview approach.
To your last question, we did indeed ponder these same questions during our 3rd density experience. We had our share of atheists and agnostics who dared to ask the tough questions which would force much philosophical and theological debate. Many of these atheists and agnostics were sincere humanists who easily graduated to our 4th density but then continued the debate while free of the velvet fog of veiled consciousness.
One of these antagonists was our quasi-pandeist Albert Einstein who asked 'What I want to know is whether God had any choice in the creation of the Universe.' In other words, does the Creator have free will to choose to come into being or not come into being?
This was an appealing question because it encompassed your philosopher's questions of 'Why something rather than nothing?' and First Cause -- both which address the issue of choice.
We feel that the First Cause was an Absolute Determinism whereby primal Non-Beingness must emerge into Beingness -- primal Non-Existence must emerge into Existence -- primal Nothingness must emerge into Somethingness. Our IUP asserts that primal Infinity must emerge into Unity.
This Absolute Invariant Determinism was the Original Thought that predicated a fixed, constant deterministic choice -- one that is invariant and necessary and infused with awareness and purpose.
This Determinism, by definition predicated 'laws', 'maxims', 'principles', etc whereby from this Absolute Invariance emerges Absolute Variance or the Free Will Principle. As the initial counter-reaction to Invariance or Constancy it is natural that this principle is by definition the 1st Variation and is infused with awareness and will.
The natural counter-reaction to this 1st Variation or Free Will Principle is to revert back to Absolute Invariance or Absolute Constancy -- a return to the Source that is infused with awareness, inspiration and deep affection and is called the Love Principle and is the 2nd Variation.
The alternating reciprocation between Free Will and Love -- called the Free Will/Determinism Dynamic -- generates primal Vibration and results in the 3rd Variation called the Light Principle which is infused with awareness and desire to manifest -- to Being and Becoming -- by which the Creator experiences Itself.
So, as you can see, the Original Thought of Absolute Determinism begets the Primal Triad and its triadic nature begets the Dynamic Hexad and a Creation of infinite richness.
To summarize, the Creator had no choice but to come into being and to desire to experience Itself through All-One-Theism so that it can pursue the mystery of the Original Thought of Determinism and Purpose.
Q. It is fascinating to consider how determinism plays such a key role. Is it a fair statement to say that this kind of determinism transcends the rather mundane scientific kind of mechanistic determinism?
A. Yes, this is quite so.
Q. Is it also fair to say that in a very fundamental sense, that Determinism needs Free Will and the converse that Free Will needs Determinism?
A. For Creation to manifest and the Creator to have Being this is of, may we say, sublime necessity, and sublime necessity is expressed by the concept of the Logos which has been called the divine ordering principle of Creation which is infused with awareness, purpose and inspiration and thus the spiritual aspect of the Mythos/Topos/Logos Triad.
Q. I think we will call this a session before my head explodes! Just kidding...this was most illuminating and we plan to visit a few nearby universities and present this session to philosophy students and others in a colloquium setting.
We feel that your material is of the clarity and profundity of your Plato and Aristotle and other philosophical luminaries and is worthy of exposition to the academic mainstream. We have a support staff who are more than ready to create Power Point presentations and go on tour to universities and engage in discussion and Q & A's with students.
Do you feel that this is a sound decision and worthwhile effort?
A. We, as always, appeal to Free Will and wish you well in your efforts. We do feel that your younger generation of students are a receptive population who are ever curious and ever questioning, so be prepared for an adventurous ride with the caveat that it is okay to plead ignorance of deep questions -- as any honest expositor would do.