03-07-2015, 06:26 AM
Monica, a lot of the posts I have seen from you have had a focus on the dichotomy between STS and STO. I was wondering what about those ideas has attracted so much of your energy that you have placed such import onto them? Are we not the Creator? Are we not one?
Yes, 3rd density would appear to be about the choice. A host of lives lived across the full spectrum of what we call "Good" or "Bad". So that we can determine which path most calls us. But unity is achieved towards the close of this universe.
I do not think the labels of STO and STS are very useful. It fosters a black and white "us vs them" perspective.
STS is often labeled "evil" and STO "good".
However the ideals of good and evil are themselves difficult to truly apply. Much of life, existence, and personality is fluid. It is ever changing and never one thing.
Labels such as good and evil or STO and STS are cookie cutter. They attempt to describe that which is always changing and thus can't be described.
In a reality where all things are the creator, where all of us are one.
We are all 100% good. 100% evil. 100% STO. 100% STS. All at once. And yet we are also none of these things. For in unity there is only being.
Nothing is "good" and nothing is "evil". All things just ARE.
One of the main points I have gathered from TLOO is that this universe is a way for the individualized creator selves that we are to experience more of who we are. Of what is possible for us to be.
From where we all are right now, reality seems very much dualistic. Day and night. Heat and absence of heat. Breathing in and breathing out. Man and Woman.
everything around us seems to have a duality. A counterpart. And it would be easy for us to believe that because this is so, duality must be one of the most important things to take notice of.
On the idea of STS and STO specifically.
STO needs STS to understand why it wants to serve and help others.
Imagine the classic idea of Christian Heaven Or even the end goal of Buddhism.
A place of eternal bliss and happiness. Where there is no strife or discord.
What I see when I look at these ideals is a place of stagnant evolution.
There would be no to very little personal development of being. At least from within this universe and it's focus on duality. For this go around we need contrast and difference to be able to experience "new" experiences.
When looked at from this view, STS is not an evil to "fight". And STO is not a good to place onto a pedestal. Both are valid expressions of experience by the creator in this dualistic universe.
The way Ra described conflict in higher densities, STS tries to take advantage of STO. But STO offers freely itself in service to STS. Thus no ground is gained on either side. As STS wants to take and STO gives.
It is 2:19 am for me right now, and I have lost track of where(if anywhere) I was going with this. I am not sure I really was able to get across what I was thinking. I have very little energy to give with regards to communicating ideas right now. So I don't think I am being as clear or eloquent as I would like. Possibly even scattered.
In regards to the idea that eating a tomato is STS. I counter with
So what? Even "STO" contains some service to self. Else all people of that persuasion would die from lack of self care.
And too, have you considered that perhaps the tomato might desire to be of service to those it can be of service to?
namely us and other animals.
That by denying the tomato this goal by refusing to partake in its nutrition, we are rejecting its attempts to be of help. Part of being service to others is the accepting of others offers of service.
Conifer16,
Namaste :-)
Yes, 3rd density would appear to be about the choice. A host of lives lived across the full spectrum of what we call "Good" or "Bad". So that we can determine which path most calls us. But unity is achieved towards the close of this universe.
I do not think the labels of STO and STS are very useful. It fosters a black and white "us vs them" perspective.
STS is often labeled "evil" and STO "good".
However the ideals of good and evil are themselves difficult to truly apply. Much of life, existence, and personality is fluid. It is ever changing and never one thing.
Labels such as good and evil or STO and STS are cookie cutter. They attempt to describe that which is always changing and thus can't be described.
In a reality where all things are the creator, where all of us are one.
We are all 100% good. 100% evil. 100% STO. 100% STS. All at once. And yet we are also none of these things. For in unity there is only being.
Nothing is "good" and nothing is "evil". All things just ARE.
One of the main points I have gathered from TLOO is that this universe is a way for the individualized creator selves that we are to experience more of who we are. Of what is possible for us to be.
From where we all are right now, reality seems very much dualistic. Day and night. Heat and absence of heat. Breathing in and breathing out. Man and Woman.
everything around us seems to have a duality. A counterpart. And it would be easy for us to believe that because this is so, duality must be one of the most important things to take notice of.
On the idea of STS and STO specifically.
STO needs STS to understand why it wants to serve and help others.
Imagine the classic idea of Christian Heaven Or even the end goal of Buddhism.
A place of eternal bliss and happiness. Where there is no strife or discord.
What I see when I look at these ideals is a place of stagnant evolution.
There would be no to very little personal development of being. At least from within this universe and it's focus on duality. For this go around we need contrast and difference to be able to experience "new" experiences.
When looked at from this view, STS is not an evil to "fight". And STO is not a good to place onto a pedestal. Both are valid expressions of experience by the creator in this dualistic universe.
The way Ra described conflict in higher densities, STS tries to take advantage of STO. But STO offers freely itself in service to STS. Thus no ground is gained on either side. As STS wants to take and STO gives.
It is 2:19 am for me right now, and I have lost track of where(if anywhere) I was going with this. I am not sure I really was able to get across what I was thinking. I have very little energy to give with regards to communicating ideas right now. So I don't think I am being as clear or eloquent as I would like. Possibly even scattered.
In regards to the idea that eating a tomato is STS. I counter with
So what? Even "STO" contains some service to self. Else all people of that persuasion would die from lack of self care.
And too, have you considered that perhaps the tomato might desire to be of service to those it can be of service to?
namely us and other animals.
That by denying the tomato this goal by refusing to partake in its nutrition, we are rejecting its attempts to be of help. Part of being service to others is the accepting of others offers of service.
Conifer16,
Namaste :-)