03-16-2015, 05:44 PM
(03-16-2015, 05:42 PM)Minyatur Wrote:(03-16-2015, 05:32 PM)AngelofDeath Wrote:(03-16-2015, 05:25 PM)Minyatur Wrote:(03-16-2015, 05:11 PM)AngelofDeath Wrote: I think you are confusing beneficent/malicious actions (often called being positive or negative) and the concept of positive and negative polarity. These are not the same thing. What you are attempting to practice by "helping with negativity" is actually what Buddhists would call "wrathful compassion".
http://www.tibetanbuddhistaltar.org/wrat...obstacles/
You want to help, I feel this is something you need to accept about yourself. Although you do not view one or other as "better" or "worse", you have clearly established a mode and intention of wanting to assist others whether that is gentle or wrathful.
Perhaps you need to accept that it's 'okay' to be leaning towards a polarity. It doesn't mean you're missing out nor does it mean you don't accept the other polarity.
I also am one who absorbs rather than radiates. The instances where I radiate to others are well chosen and less likely to happen.
Actually I've been leaning toward the positive path all along, it recently came to me I might not have been positively polarized prior to incarnating on this sphere. Not that I think it matters, I might actually prefer to change polarity whatever it was.
You absorb and radiate in pretty equal amounts from what I detect. It also seems you only absorb what is given, you do not take. I actually would agree with you that you did not come here from the positive polarity, but as you said, you are striving for balance, so that would naturally mean you would probably be exploring positive polarity now. Maybe you made it all the way to the end of negative and now are re-polarizing and so learning the lessons of positive polarity. I say these things partly out of my own familiarity with the concept as I have considered the same for myself.
That seems to be how I feel. But the end of negative polarity doesn't seem bad in itself, it seems like a support to the lower negative densities.
I can't imagine a negative of that high would be overly concerned about 'supporting'. Rather, I think it would be seen that absolute knowledge of self cannot be obtained through only one path and the truly balanced entity will explore both completely. I believe the 'end' of both paths are the same point and they happen when our negative self meets our positive self and the difference is released.