03-16-2015, 09:35 PM
They enslave the lower negative which "supports" them by providing them with an opportunity to advance in the negative, but assuredly it is only for the gain of the higher entity. However, I would be hard-pressed to consider them doing it "for" the lower densities, rather than being a result of their sways of power.
I do not agree however that they act on the same intentions as I believe that in itself is the actual split between polarities. It is the intention which differentiates the polarities. Thus, I believe two entities could be doing the same actions and be oppositely polarized.
Probably, the negative would not view "other" negative entities as being other than themselves. They would view all solely as themselves. Hence, the apparent 'support' for lower negative entities would be considered part of their self-service since all is them.
I actually think it is unfair to try to equate the paths to eachother. To try and twist things around so that every negative is positive and every positive is negative just seems like an attempt to resolve some kind of cognitive dissonance.
I accept both paths. I accept that positive radiates and accepts. I accept that negative absorbs and controls. I do not try to give the traits of positive to negative, or vice versa, for they are both equal in their own rights without needing to equate them to eachother. I think one of the keys to greater acceptance is accepting the fact that negativity and unpleasantness is indeed something that exists and is something that some entities genuine prefer. I would not try to take that away from them by trying to convince them they are actually just positive in the end, that is not my position.
I do not agree however that they act on the same intentions as I believe that in itself is the actual split between polarities. It is the intention which differentiates the polarities. Thus, I believe two entities could be doing the same actions and be oppositely polarized.
Probably, the negative would not view "other" negative entities as being other than themselves. They would view all solely as themselves. Hence, the apparent 'support' for lower negative entities would be considered part of their self-service since all is them.
I actually think it is unfair to try to equate the paths to eachother. To try and twist things around so that every negative is positive and every positive is negative just seems like an attempt to resolve some kind of cognitive dissonance.
I accept both paths. I accept that positive radiates and accepts. I accept that negative absorbs and controls. I do not try to give the traits of positive to negative, or vice versa, for they are both equal in their own rights without needing to equate them to eachother. I think one of the keys to greater acceptance is accepting the fact that negativity and unpleasantness is indeed something that exists and is something that some entities genuine prefer. I would not try to take that away from them by trying to convince them they are actually just positive in the end, that is not my position.