07-27-2010, 08:47 PM
Hey all,
I've been unclear on something for far too long and I'm hoping you can set me right on something. I'm not sure how to view the densities in relationship to our own 3rd density, and the universe in general. Allow me to elaborate...
I believe I am correct in understanding a density to be synonymous for the most part with a dimension. So when Ra says in session 6 of Venus:
We see that Ra uses the terms density and dimension seemingly interchangeably. Also in this statement, to my mind, it is implied that 3rd, 5th and 6th density Venus's are co-existing. Q'uo has often spoken about how 3rd and 4th density Earths are also currently co-existing. So far so good.
But then we run in to statements such as this:
So now I am confused. Worded this way, it sounds like the densities co-exist in the same space/time. Is this the case?
Furthermore, we know that on Earth we have three densities (dimensions??) that are co-existing. The mineral kingdom of 1st density, the plant/animal density of 2nd and our own human 3rd density.
So I guess what I'm wondering is what approach makes the most sense in terms of thinking of the densities. Do they all overlap and exist in the same space/time (one after the other in the same universe), or are the independent dimensions that exist in their own space/time (e.g. two versions of Earth, one 3rd d. one 4th d. both existing simultaneously but unseen from each other)?
I've been unclear on something for far too long and I'm hoping you can set me right on something. I'm not sure how to view the densities in relationship to our own 3rd density, and the universe in general. Allow me to elaborate...
I believe I am correct in understanding a density to be synonymous for the most part with a dimension. So when Ra says in session 6 of Venus:
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The third-density conditions are not hospitable to the life-forms of your peoples. The fifth and sixth dimensions of that planetary sphere are quite conducive to growing/learning/teaching.
We see that Ra uses the terms density and dimension seemingly interchangeably. Also in this statement, to my mind, it is implied that 3rd, 5th and 6th density Venus's are co-existing. Q'uo has often spoken about how 3rd and 4th density Earths are also currently co-existing. So far so good.
But then we run in to statements such as this:
Quote:89.9 Questioner: It appears that the end of Ra’s third density coincided with the beginning of this planet’s second density. Is that correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is roughly correct.
So now I am confused. Worded this way, it sounds like the densities co-exist in the same space/time. Is this the case?
Furthermore, we know that on Earth we have three densities (dimensions??) that are co-existing. The mineral kingdom of 1st density, the plant/animal density of 2nd and our own human 3rd density.
So I guess what I'm wondering is what approach makes the most sense in terms of thinking of the densities. Do they all overlap and exist in the same space/time (one after the other in the same universe), or are the independent dimensions that exist in their own space/time (e.g. two versions of Earth, one 3rd d. one 4th d. both existing simultaneously but unseen from each other)?