04-05-2015, 02:48 PM
(04-05-2015, 12:33 PM)Diana Wrote: First, I didn't say it invalidated it.
I was only trying to put the question to a person, who has the ability and freedom to decide for him/herself. Personally, I don't take Carla's changelings of Ra as a bible. I love all the info, but I think for myself.
We have gone over this ground extensively in years past, regarding Ra's comments to Carla. I was also trying to avoid past rabbit holes that never seem to get anywhere. If using Ra's comments to Carla to justify meat eating works for someone, that's their decision. But as I said, I think for myself—that is my logic.
Well, I didn't say that you, Diana, specifically, invalidated either. But the posts Monica linked basically seemed to argue that it wasn't advice for anybody but Carla, and that fact seemingly invalidated it being supportive of the idea that Ra, the sixth density STO being of light, would advocate the eating of meat for anyone other than Carla.
The reason I bring it up, is that any time anyone brings it up, they are linked to a bunch of past posts that supposedly clear up why it it isn't good advice for anyone. And that it has all been "figured out" before somehow, and that it no longer warrants discussion. And that seems like a cop out to me, and an easy way to avoid discussing it, or thinking about it further. Sometimes, in the spirit of thinking for ourselves, it is good to tread over old ground, to discover the fine nuances of truth in the cracks of the rocks around the issue. And it is okay to discuss things over again, in a newer thread, that is not just a database of old posts. If people are tired of discussing it, they don't have to participate. I have conversations about old topics all the time with friends, and we discover new aspects every time. I find new and more concise ways of relating old points, without filibustering a page with unneeded length.
But anyway, the logic seemingly offered doesn't hold up for me, because it is like it assumes that Carla's physiology was sooooooooooo rare that nobody else in the world would benefit from those suggestions that were tailored to Carla.
I hold the Ra channelings dear as well. And don't take it as bible, but I've also learned so much from Ra's wisdom, that I can't just brush off a topic that they *DID* to some extent offer words on, just because I don't like what they say. So we have to ask ourselves, again, in the spirit of thinking for ourselves, if Ra is a sixth density service to others being of light, and it is allegedly depolarizing for an STO being to eat meat from animals, why would they advise it for Carla, an obviously STO being? Wouldn't they have offered her an STO vegan alternative instead? I mean, if it was unnecessary.
Just something worth thinking about, I thought.