04-05-2015, 04:36 PM
(04-05-2015, 04:05 PM)Monica Wrote: Personally, I resonate almost 100% with virtually everything Ra has said. I have no conflicts with the Material.
I don't think they did advise Carla to eat meat at all. I think they accepted that she already did, and worked with her according to her own choices.
Remember, Don never asked Ra if eating meat was depolarizing. Nor did he ever ask anything about eating meat from the perspective of the victims. The question was only asked in the context of Carla's allergies.
In analyzing Ra's response, I think it's important to remember Ra's M.O.: Ra always answered direct questions and didn't usually volunteer information that wasn't asked for.
Okay, Ra doesn't volunteer information unless asked. Let's work with that.
Isn't Ra still STO? Don't they take the free will of all into consideration when giving advice? Even the animals? Why wouldn't they just not mention meat at all? And simply suggest some plant sourced protein?
They didn't have to even mention meats, hence no volunteering information about it. If it was my custom to lie, would Ra incorporate the advice of lying into my behavior if I asked advice on how to better my situation in life? Or if it was my custom to murder humans (and furthermore believed it was the right thing to do, lets say I thought I was protecting my people by performing some kind of sacrifice (i'm thinking of tribal ancient humans)) would they incorporate that into advice about someone? Would they not say anything? To respect my free will decisions? I sincerely doubt that.
Do you? These are extreme hypotheticals, but I can't in all honesty think an STO being would not say anything (if it were, in fact, extremely depolarizing).
And suppose you're right, and Ra is just accepting the free will decisions of a given person in such a dialog, isn't that telling? That a sixth density being of light feels no need to be an activist on the issue and try to change people? What do you make of that? What example is Ra setting?