04-06-2015, 10:46 PM
To Parsons:
There is a seeming contradiction in what you have emphasized. Note what Ra said here, and what I have emphasized:
If it truly were impossible to judge the polarity of an entity or an act, Ra would not have been able to make an assessment of Adolf Hitler. I think that the key is the intent of what Don asked, and where the question was leading to. Note my emphasis:
It seems likely that the intent of the question and where the question was leading to was in regards to 3D illusion. If your implication was that there was no way of knowing what polarity an act or an entity was at all, then how could any entity be harvested according to its polarity?
There is a seeming contradiction in what you have emphasized. Note what Ra said here, and what I have emphasized:
Quote:35.4 Questioner: I would now like to ask for the same type of information with respect to Adolf Hitler. You have given a little of this already. It is not necessary to re-cover what you have already given, but if you could complete that information it would be helpful.
Ra: I am Ra. In speaking of the one you call Adolf we have some difficulty due to the intense amount of confusion present in this entity’s life patterns as well as the great confusion which greets any discussion of this entity.
Here we see an example of one who, in attempting activation of the highest rays of energy while lacking the green-ray key, canceled itself out as far as polarization either towards positive or negative. This entity was basically negative. However, its confusion was such that the personality disintegrated, thus leaving the mind/body/spirit complex unharvestable and much in need of healing.
This entity followed the pattern of negative polarization which suggests the elite and the enslaved, this being seen by the entity to be of an helpful nature for the societal structure. However, in drifting from the conscious polarization into what you may call a twilight world where dream took the place of events in your space/time continuum, this entity failed in its attempt to serve the Creator in an harvestable degree along the path of service to self. Thus we see the so-called insanity which may often arise when an entity attempts to polarize more quickly than experience may be integrated.
We have advised and suggested caution and patience in previous communications and do so again, using this entity as an example of the over-hasty opening of polarization without due attention to the synthesized and integrated mind/body/spirit complex. To know your self is to have the foundation upon firm ground.
Category: People: Adolf Hitler
If it truly were impossible to judge the polarity of an entity or an act, Ra would not have been able to make an assessment of Adolf Hitler. I think that the key is the intent of what Don asked, and where the question was leading to. Note my emphasis:
Quote:Questioner: Thank you. The foundation of our present illusion we have stated previously to be the concept of polarity. I would ask that since we have defined the two polarities as service to others and service to self, is there a more complete or eloquent or enlightening definition or any more information that we don’t have at this time on the two ends of the poles that would give us a better insight into the nature of polarity itself?
Ra: I am Ra. It is unlikely that there is a more pithy or eloquent description of the polarities of third density than service to others and service to self due to the nature of the mind/body/spirit complexes’ distortions towards perceiving concepts relating to philosophy in terms of ethics or activity. However, we might consider the polarities using slightly variant terms. In this way a possible enrichment of insight might be achieved for some.
One might consider the polarities with the literal nature enjoyed by the physical polarity of the magnet. The negative and positive, with their electrical characteristics, may be seen to be just as in the physical sense. It is to be noted in this context that it is quite impossible to judge the polarity of an act or an entity, just as it is impossible to judge the relative goodness of the negative and positive poles of the magnet.
Another method of viewing polarities might involve the concept of radiation/absorption. That which is positive is radiant; that which is negative is absorbent.
It seems likely that the intent of the question and where the question was leading to was in regards to 3D illusion. If your implication was that there was no way of knowing what polarity an act or an entity was at all, then how could any entity be harvested according to its polarity?