Oh, last thought. If you want to add to nothing, you change the equation.
1 = 0
1 + 0 = 1 (= 0?)
Addition is light, radiation. This is equilibrium tipped towards growth, towards positive number expansion. Negative is 'darkness' or absorption, equilibrium tipped towards decay, negative number expansion.
The question here then is, what occurs to make the equilibrium (=) become positive (+) or negative (-)? Thus we have the conundrum and drama of free will and the epoch of experience it is taking to understand this simple equation, nevermind multiplication and division...
So goes the saga of polarity.
1 = 0
1 + 0 = 1 (= 0?)
Addition is light, radiation. This is equilibrium tipped towards growth, towards positive number expansion. Negative is 'darkness' or absorption, equilibrium tipped towards decay, negative number expansion.
The question here then is, what occurs to make the equilibrium (=) become positive (+) or negative (-)? Thus we have the conundrum and drama of free will and the epoch of experience it is taking to understand this simple equation, nevermind multiplication and division...
So goes the saga of polarity.
Quote:77.19 Questioner: Do the Logoi that choose this type of evolution choose both the service-to-self and the service-to-others path for different Logoi, or do they choose just one of the paths?
Ra: I am Ra. Those, what you would call, early Logoi which chose lack-of-free-will foundations, to all extents with no exceptions, founded Logoi of the service-to-others path. The, shall we say, saga of polarity, its consequences and limits, were unimagined until experienced.