Simultaneity, regarding the OIC's origins

[VanAlioSaldo]

I believe the Void/Everything is constantly, always present. It's not a paradox either because the Void is not exclusive to everything, nor is everything exclusive to the Void, in fact they necessitate eachother, they are One and the same.

Barring the Paradox mentioning (which I'll try my best to explain why), this is basically the best manner of explanation that most deeply resonated with me.

I think it can be a paradox, but does not necessarily mean it must be.  I think the possibility is closer to a yes than a no though the majority of the time.

I only think this because in the madness of Simultaneity, it allows for paradoxes of paradoxes.  Imagine this, that there was a Creator who created itself by simply Being.  That's a paradox of a paradox in and of itself.  A being who is unmade, creates itself, by simply Being, yet is unmade.

Which is wholly possible in the context of an unmanifest creator creating.  Which I think as mentioned before, also fits in well with how Ra refers to Purity of Being as that which is closest to the True Beingness of Anything.  True Rock (in terms of creating the Pyramids) as an example used by Ra might actually shed some light to this aspect of Purity of Beingness, that all things have a distorted and undistorted Beingness.

That all things are both perfect and imperfect.  That All Things are both One and Many.  If not paradoxically, than nonparadoxically, which again, in simultaneity, is not much different from saying a paradox that both is and is not a paradox.  Which would honestly allow for...I'm going to be a hypocrite here and say, unimaginable ways of operations.

A non/paradox aspect adds a new layer of depth, something new/different happening in ways that don't seem logically coherent or proper, yet possible.

Maybe we need to look at the point before manifestation of beingness, and instead try to understand how beingness is without a distorted/manifested aspect. What constitutes Undistorted and Perfect?