Simultaneity, regarding the OIC's origins

[Minyatur]

I honestly think our disagreements bring us closer together in understanding each other.  I feel in an existence where All is One, is the disagreement not in itself an agreement?  If you can make opposites whole, in my mind specifically, you can make All, One.  The good, the bad, and the beginning, the end, the forward and backwards, the past and future, the living and dead, the sadness and the happiness, the disagreements and the agreements.  Reading this list backwards, or forward.

If All is One, then is everything we've said not both exactly wrong and right?  Is everything we've said not possible in the great infinity of beingness that is both One, and All?  From a Primordial Void that itself was Beingness, to a Plenum that itself was Beingness, to the paradox of Beingness, to the Recursive-Being, and back again?

Without disagreements we would be non-evolving fools. Far too often in my life have I come back on past ideas I rejected only to integrate them within my mind.

Most of disagreements on this thread came from the way things are worded. Not saying it is necessarily the case here and now, but a lot of disagreements on these subjects can be caused by negative entities interfering with our minds. The chaos is generates can be fruitful in developing ideas further where a simple agreement would've been stagnant.