Session 011

[anagogy]

The one known as Taras Bulba, the one known as Genghis Khan, the one known as Rasputin.

It is particularly odd that Ra would name Taras Bulba as one of these people since Taras Bulba was a fictional character. According to Wikipedia, the character “іs based on several historical personalities.” This is a very strange mistake for Ra to make. What did they intend to say? Why would they name a fictional character? What is the source and nature of this mistake?

In that same wikipedia article: "The character of Taras Bulba is a composite of several historical personalities. It is mainly based on the legend of cossack captain Sava Chaly (executed in 1741 after serving as a colonel in the private army of a Polish noble), whose killing was ordered by his own father for betraying the Ukrainian cause."

Perhaps in the same way that Ra catered to our use of the vibratory sound complex "Jesus" even though that was not that entities actual name, they used the name they could most readily associate with popular cultural association to point at this other indicated individual.  Perhaps this was merely another example of that.

Perhaps this "Sava Chaly" is the real Taras Bulba.  

Will the real Taras Bulba please stand up?

There are others whose vibratory complex is such that this gateway is opened and contact with total service to self with its primal distortion of manipulation of others is then afforded with little or no difficulty, no training, and no control.

Could this possibly be related to psychopathy?

That is good possibility.  A truly STS being would likely come across as an intelligent sociopath. A highly polarized STS being would be able to feign compassion easily, however, if required.  What I think Ra is talking about though is someone who has found power and purpose through service to self, yet lacks the discipline to properly use that drive to achieve great influence with it.

the vibratory distortions of third-density illusion caused this entity to become extremely distorted in its perceptions of its fellow mind/body/spirit complexes so that its mission was hindered and in the result, perverted from its purposes.

In what ways were Nikola Tesla’s perceptions distorted towards others?

I think he grew extremely mistrustful of those entities in association with him.  Probably, like most wanderers, he came into this incarnation with a sort of naivete towards other beings natural distortions toward manipulating others for personal gain.  Over the course of his life, this innocence was gradually shattered, and disillusioned by repeated interactions with others.