(05-18-2015, 03:56 PM)Tan.rar Wrote: Well, sure, it implies it as a symbol, but a change in focus doesn't really necessitate a change in structure as such, because the rays still support eachother in a particular arrangement. If you look at the actual properties of light spectrum (which I use as the model for my understanding of the octave, along with music) there is a reason red is on one end and violet on the other. This is structural arrangement rather than being the result of any particular focus.
Thus, what I suggest is that what changes with each octave is the evolution of the One Thought of the Creator. At the beginning of this octave the One Thought had been refined in such a way in the previous octave so as to yield the lessons in this octave. I believe it is the same in this octave in that it is refining the One Thought to yield the lessons of the next octave. Thus, moving in to the next Octave the focus is already set and built through this octave, so starting in red, through to violet, is taking the same thought through another cycle of awareness and refinement.
Specifically, I believe the 'colours' are manifestations of particular densities. So even if the focus was different the structure would still have a base, foundation, and a highest vibration. Maybe the next octave is weird and the spectrum has rearranged itself, maybe red manifests within a different frequency wavelength, but I would remind that "red" and all colours are just translations and identifiers we have placed on particular wavelengths. I believe regardless the structure will be the same even if it doesn't manifest through the same descriptors we use now.
I didn't mean to say the structure would be different, just that the next octave could reach a higher vibration focus than it is possible in this one just as this one is able to reach a higher vibration focus than possible in the the previous one. Ra said that mid 1D is the 8D of the previous Octave, so the focus could easily be unlike what I proposed earlier.
From my understanding all Octaves should exist in a way one within the other with 8D emerging into a new 1D, but you said in another thread that you did not agree with this notion.
From your understanding a previous Octave would be "elsewhere" entirely with no direct connection with this one? Particles forming matter being the 8D-1D connection that brings forth this current Octave made a lot of sense to me.