Session 013

[Nicholas]

Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

How/why did infinity become aware? Was this awareness simply because within infinity, awareness is one potential? What sparked this awareness?

I am going to borrow from Barbara Marciniak's slant on things in order to express my perspective here. I will capitalise the "Self" to represent the Creator. The Creator knowing itself is a 3 fold process, that being; Self exploration, Self expression and Self Gratification. These 3 aspects, or triad points are not possible without the freedom of will of awareness. So that sufficiently explains to me the "why" part. To explore, to express, to attain. Perhaps there is some connection there regarding the 3 primal distortions and the 3 aspects of "Prime Creator" knowing itself, as described through Barbara. Or perhaps not?

As for how? A big pass on that one! Further, I do not sense that awareness is a potential as such but more a position that makes its infinite potentials viewable or knowable.

What sparked this awareness? I would say that there was no spark. We are trying to understand the grandaddy of paradox's here. The illusion of linear time and logic has manifested a then, now and after narrative. There is no beginning to all of this and there is no end to it. These "steps" of creation appear (to me) to be an approximate narrative attempting to quench our thirst for the truth, in tangible terms. Even my attempts to express my perception have been thwarted by the limitations inherently placed upon us in 3D.

The energy moves from the intelligent infinity due first to the outpouring of randomized creative force, this then creating patterns which in holographic style appear as the entire creation no matter which direction or energy is explored.

If you could put this in other words, how would you say it? Specifically with the concept of “creating patterns in holographic style appear as the entire creation no matter which direction or energy is explored.”

Not my words but lyrics I recall from an old house track: "Let there be light!"

The energies moved in increasingly intelligent patterns until the individualization of various energies emanating from the creative principle of intelligent infinity became such as to be co-Creators.

Are these co-Creators the sub-Logoi?

Yup. Here is my first opportunity to share an early 1990's pop song that appears (sub sub) to have metaphysical awareness behind it. The lyrical message adds levity imo.

The concept of light is instrumental in grasping this great leap of thought as this vibrational distortion of infinity is the building block of that which is known as matter, the light being intelligent and full of energy, thus being the first distortion of intelligent infinity which was called by the creative principle.

How exactly would you define or describe this light in your own words?

This is my very loose description/definition. Lets equate Wisdom with the first distortion, that is intelligent infinity became conscious of itself. Is it not wise to objectively observe oneself? Then, lets equate Love with the second distortion of chaotic, randomised energy. So my simplified version of light would be Power, or the manifestation of the Creator. Hence the Creator being expressed as "Father". The masculine or "physical" principle? Or maybe I have confused wisdom with power?

This is why I would enjoy a study group. To bounce ideas off of each other in the attempt to reach a less distorted understanding of Ra's teachings.

This light of love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line, as you would call it. This paradox is responsible for the shape of the various physical illusion entities you call solar systems, galaxies, and planets, all revolving and tending towards the lenticular.

What is paradoxical about the straight line?

What is the correlation between the straight line and the lenticular shape?

I believe you have answered both queries below

Thus, each solar system has its own, shall we say, local coordinate system of illusory natural laws.

Does this mean that solar systems essentially have their own laws of physics different from the physics we study locally?

Yes in my view. That's the prerogative of the sub logoi. What individual effect can a conductor have without any creative freedom?

This begins with first density which is the density of consciousness, the mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being. This is the first density.

How do you imagine that mineral and water “learn” from fire and wind? How does awareness come from this?

I imagine chaos (heat and turbulence) teaches the primal forms of life where to grow (red ray opportunities).

The spiraling energy, which is the characteristic of what you call “light,” moves in straight line spiral thus giving spirals an inevitable vector upwards to a more comprehensive beingness with regards to intelligent infinity.  

I was curious about this term "straight line spiral" and how it is relevant to what Ra is describing, and I found this great resource: http://larc.unt.edu/ian/art/4ants/

Do you think this is the same "straight line spiral" Ra was talking about? If so, how does it give an inevitable vector upwards?

That source articulates this paradox beautifully Austin! That's my evaluation on it at least. Your final query reminds me of the subtleties between the physical/literal and metaphysical/metaphorical interpretations of this material. Could we replace "upwards" with "inwards"?
[/quote]