05-27-2015, 05:17 AM
@Diana
This does actually help me.
I'll try for an analogy though, my issue may just be isolated to 3D Free Will perspective versus...above perspectives.
A person walks into a life. They get punched in the face and then are told they choose for this all to happen, and that its their fault, this, for getting punched. Person shrugs it off being a cool open person. Sits at a bar and the stool collapses, lifetender comes over and says its their fault, their responsibility, they need to pay for it, or else.
Person pays for the stool with whatever they had intended to use to buy something else. Person has nothing left to pay for and so opts for a different life, on the way out gets told because they didn't do specific things they'll need to come back to eventually do things a better way, and that if they dont they'll have to pay for it somehow someway somewhere else.
Person says this wasnt what they wanted, gets told it was and that that isn't an excuse to not be thepreferred way you choose to have occur regardless if your as another person who knows nothing.
My issue is 3D, is it consensual to the beings who identify as separate from their 'actual identity'?
Does consenting, then becoming amnesiac but still bound by this Life Contact not identified as infringing the free will of the 3D being when they become aware of how things operate without memory of such?
When the person no longer consents, why isn't is considered in the whole of things?
Their suffering is used to learn, what happens when the being no longer consents on a 3D level regardless of what the soul wants?
Why is it indifference towards these views?? This single thing is pretty much shaking the entire foundation of the Law of One i have. That being all is Love, experienced with free will. Except All isn't if this is the case. Free Will is ignored in 3D self-aware beings because they're treated as if they were the same being, when its highly clear they are not.
What gives...?
This does actually help me.
I'll try for an analogy though, my issue may just be isolated to 3D Free Will perspective versus...above perspectives.
A person walks into a life. They get punched in the face and then are told they choose for this all to happen, and that its their fault, this, for getting punched. Person shrugs it off being a cool open person. Sits at a bar and the stool collapses, lifetender comes over and says its their fault, their responsibility, they need to pay for it, or else.
Person pays for the stool with whatever they had intended to use to buy something else. Person has nothing left to pay for and so opts for a different life, on the way out gets told because they didn't do specific things they'll need to come back to eventually do things a better way, and that if they dont they'll have to pay for it somehow someway somewhere else.
Person says this wasnt what they wanted, gets told it was and that that isn't an excuse to not be thepreferred way you choose to have occur regardless if your as another person who knows nothing.
My issue is 3D, is it consensual to the beings who identify as separate from their 'actual identity'?
Does consenting, then becoming amnesiac but still bound by this Life Contact not identified as infringing the free will of the 3D being when they become aware of how things operate without memory of such?
When the person no longer consents, why isn't is considered in the whole of things?
Their suffering is used to learn, what happens when the being no longer consents on a 3D level regardless of what the soul wants?
Why is it indifference towards these views?? This single thing is pretty much shaking the entire foundation of the Law of One i have. That being all is Love, experienced with free will. Except All isn't if this is the case. Free Will is ignored in 3D self-aware beings because they're treated as if they were the same being, when its highly clear they are not.
What gives...?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)