06-02-2015, 09:38 PM
(06-02-2015, 09:29 PM)Shawnna Wrote: Neither is acceptable and we should continue to support research into medical treatment based on the specific genome of the individual. Doing that will allow us to know ahead of time whether or not a vaccine will cause harm to a specific individual.
Better yet, use immune-enhancing methods that aren't toxic. As with cancer treatments, it is ludicrous to poison the body and expect a favorable response.
I agree that personalized medicine is a definite improvement, but it isn't enough. The entire paradigm needs to change too.
(06-02-2015, 09:29 PM)Shawnna Wrote: At the end of the day, the real issue is are we functioning as a society based on sound scientific evidence, or are we functioning as a society based on fear and misinformation?
Agreed! As my previous posts show, there is an abundance of disinfo and outright lies, perpetuated from the corrupt pharmaceutical industry, who are in bed with our govt.
(06-02-2015, 09:29 PM)Shawnna Wrote: I would hope that we continue to function as a society based on sound scientific evidence, knowing that in those rare instances when something terrible happens, we will take care of and honor the individuals involved until our medical science is sophisticated enough the impact of a vaccine to an individual before it is given.
The instances are far less rare than they admit. Did you watch the video I posted about the vaccine court? It's not happening, sadly.