I appreciate your effort at finding common ground, Splash. I understand the gist of what you're saying but I don't think it's as simple as you seem to think it is. There are many other factors at play as to why people succumb to plagues. People in developing countries are more susceptible to some diseases because of lack of sanitation, clean drinking water, etc. On the other hand, people in industrialized nations are more susceptible to other diseases for other reasons: impaired immune system due to junk food diet, excessive poisons in the air, food and water, and...toxic chemicals being injected into them. It's a trade-off.
It is precisely because I AM concerned about future plagues that I chose not to vaccinate!
Diseases don't strike at random. There are reasons, and diseases have life cycles. There are higher susceptibility in certain conditions. For example, obviously some diseases are a much bigger threat in impoverished areas lacking sanitation and clean drinking water. They cannot vaccinate for every known disease, and even IF they did that, what would be the cost to the person's health? It's impossible to know, but common sense dictates that the more poisons injected into the blood, the more potential risk to the immune system there is. Children already get 48 vaccines - each one containing a toxic cocktail of poisons - by age 6! Where does it end? Can anyone seriously suggest that there is NO price to be paid for injecting so many poisons directly into the blood? And let's not forget that they are preserved so they cannot be excreted like other poisons...meaning that they will accumulate over time.
And that's not even taking into consideration whether they are a slow, normal, fast or ultra-fast metabolizer.
The DNA test that my company does (also done by Mayo Clinic, John Hopkins, Duke, Vanderbilt, etc.) acknowledges that, based on the person's metabolic ability to process drugs, drugs will either be efficacious, or toxic because they build up in the system. It is a known fact that slow metabolizers cannot metabolize drugs and that's why they are even more toxic for those individuals than for others, and 106,000+ people die each year from adverse drug reactions from prescription drugs used properly (not even counting overdoses, etc.).
If this is a known fact with drugs that are ingested, then how much more does this apply to drugs that are preserved and designed to stay in the body?
The irony will be that a virulent, mutated virus, for which there is NO vaccine, could wipe out much of the world's population, precisely because they were weakened by too many poisons in their system.
There is enough clinical evidence on homeopathy for it to be considered as a harmless yet effective, viable alternative. The medical system in the US will never study it seriously though, because there's no money in it. At the end of the day, drug companies study drugs so that they can make a profit. If there's no profit, then there's no research or development.
Thankfully, doctors in other countries are using homeopathy and gathering data. Parents have access to this information, if they choose to pursue it. They also have access to homeopathic vaccines, if they choose to find them. I advocate choice.
Undoubtedly, most of the people administering vaccines have good intentions. I speak not of them, but of the massive drug industry behind them.
I don't think the negative elite is trying to kill us all off. They wouldn't have any food to eat if they did that, being that they eat fear and hate for breakfast.
I advocate simply for people to investigate this and decide for themselves, instead of blindly believing the propaganda from the biggest industry/monopoly in the world.
It is precisely because I AM concerned about future plagues that I chose not to vaccinate!
Diseases don't strike at random. There are reasons, and diseases have life cycles. There are higher susceptibility in certain conditions. For example, obviously some diseases are a much bigger threat in impoverished areas lacking sanitation and clean drinking water. They cannot vaccinate for every known disease, and even IF they did that, what would be the cost to the person's health? It's impossible to know, but common sense dictates that the more poisons injected into the blood, the more potential risk to the immune system there is. Children already get 48 vaccines - each one containing a toxic cocktail of poisons - by age 6! Where does it end? Can anyone seriously suggest that there is NO price to be paid for injecting so many poisons directly into the blood? And let's not forget that they are preserved so they cannot be excreted like other poisons...meaning that they will accumulate over time.
And that's not even taking into consideration whether they are a slow, normal, fast or ultra-fast metabolizer.
The DNA test that my company does (also done by Mayo Clinic, John Hopkins, Duke, Vanderbilt, etc.) acknowledges that, based on the person's metabolic ability to process drugs, drugs will either be efficacious, or toxic because they build up in the system. It is a known fact that slow metabolizers cannot metabolize drugs and that's why they are even more toxic for those individuals than for others, and 106,000+ people die each year from adverse drug reactions from prescription drugs used properly (not even counting overdoses, etc.).
If this is a known fact with drugs that are ingested, then how much more does this apply to drugs that are preserved and designed to stay in the body?
The irony will be that a virulent, mutated virus, for which there is NO vaccine, could wipe out much of the world's population, precisely because they were weakened by too many poisons in their system.
There is enough clinical evidence on homeopathy for it to be considered as a harmless yet effective, viable alternative. The medical system in the US will never study it seriously though, because there's no money in it. At the end of the day, drug companies study drugs so that they can make a profit. If there's no profit, then there's no research or development.
Thankfully, doctors in other countries are using homeopathy and gathering data. Parents have access to this information, if they choose to pursue it. They also have access to homeopathic vaccines, if they choose to find them. I advocate choice.
Undoubtedly, most of the people administering vaccines have good intentions. I speak not of them, but of the massive drug industry behind them.
I don't think the negative elite is trying to kill us all off. They wouldn't have any food to eat if they did that, being that they eat fear and hate for breakfast.
I advocate simply for people to investigate this and decide for themselves, instead of blindly believing the propaganda from the biggest industry/monopoly in the world.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)