08-24-2010, 12:17 AM
Hey everyone!
I had a chance to print out and read this thread over the course of a few weeks at my slow poke pace. Very interesting subjects raised here... and I'm glad to have the opportunity to pop a few of my own questions in.
Are you speaking about the so called 'twin' paradox? If so or even if not, could you please elaborate here?
This was mentioned briefly, but I wanted to chip in my own distorted and somewhat limited understanding of what time/space is like. It is pretty crude though. Basically we have one dimension of space in this reality. So you're not going to have the same freedom of movement that we enjoy now. This sounds like a limitation, but I have a feeling it isn't viewed that way once dis-incarnate. But you can move in three directions of time. I presume this is past, present, and future... Although "moving in the present" doesn't make much sense. (this whole view breaks down quite easily, may I add). Anyhow- we know that time/space is where life reviews take place, which is convenient considering the freedom of movement in time that exists there (for reviews, and planning). I gather that time/space is more of a 'mental' place, so time would be what you want to be flexible the most. Just like this world, space/time, is where we are 'physical', and want to be free in that way the most (so we can learn our lessons).
Could you point me towards this thread? I have looked for it in vain, maybe it has a title I didn't expect. It does sound quite interesting, and probably has truth to it. The implication is that there is something 'outside' of our octave of experience, or universe. (hey, it could all be like this.
)
That's it for now, unless you've come up with any more creative ways to explain what moving in time is like. I rather enjoyed your analogies.
Love and light,
Lavazza
I had a chance to print out and read this thread over the course of a few weeks at my slow poke pace. Very interesting subjects raised here... and I'm glad to have the opportunity to pop a few of my own questions in.
3D Sunset Wrote:Quote:...Thus all physical activity, all change that occurs in the system of motions that constitutes the universe, extends from unity, not from zero.
Does this not sound like intelligent infinity? And what are deviations, than distortions away from intelligent infinity? Interestingly, this simple observation also actually resolves a paradox which has long been present, and summarily ignored in Einstein's general relativity.
Are you speaking about the so called 'twin' paradox? If so or even if not, could you please elaborate here?
Quote:I can't quite imagine yet what he really means by multiple dimensions of time, or movement in time, or how movement closer together in time means movement further apart in space. I mean I know they are reciprocal aspects, but that's just an abstract equation, I want to be able to visualize it.
This was mentioned briefly, but I wanted to chip in my own distorted and somewhat limited understanding of what time/space is like. It is pretty crude though. Basically we have one dimension of space in this reality. So you're not going to have the same freedom of movement that we enjoy now. This sounds like a limitation, but I have a feeling it isn't viewed that way once dis-incarnate. But you can move in three directions of time. I presume this is past, present, and future... Although "moving in the present" doesn't make much sense. (this whole view breaks down quite easily, may I add). Anyhow- we know that time/space is where life reviews take place, which is convenient considering the freedom of movement in time that exists there (for reviews, and planning). I gather that time/space is more of a 'mental' place, so time would be what you want to be flexible the most. Just like this world, space/time, is where we are 'physical', and want to be free in that way the most (so we can learn our lessons).
3D Sunset Wrote:Does this mean then, that all 3D existence is in neutral space/time, and between incarnations, we move to neutral time/space? It doesn't seem correct that the area of the choice should be done in either positive or negative space/time. This too, is an area for further discussion (Note: I've started a new thread on this topic on the "Strictly Law of One" forum.)
Could you point me towards this thread? I have looked for it in vain, maybe it has a title I didn't expect. It does sound quite interesting, and probably has truth to it. The implication is that there is something 'outside' of our octave of experience, or universe. (hey, it could all be like this.
)That's it for now, unless you've come up with any more creative ways to explain what moving in time is like. I rather enjoyed your analogies.
Love and light,
Lavazza