08-29-2010, 11:58 PM
Hi, Gary and others! 
My input:
1) When mixed or negative material begins making its entrance into our forums, what possible consequences can you foresee in terms of our tuning?
Negative material can severely lessen the positive impact of the Ra and Q'uo material. With the new forum, it's possible that the site may become a jumbled mess of channeled messages coming from everywhere and speaking in many different styles of communication. I feel that the basic idea behind the site (the study of the Law of One in order to best learn how to bring forth your love and bring 4th density) could be lost in the cacophony. A good analogy would be like placing a lampshade over an uncovered bulb.
2) What constitutes detuning? (Loss of tuning.)
That's a very good question. I think we all know what love is and how to manifest it in our lives. I think this is because we are all able to draw the same basic message from the LOO material. If we allow other material that contains an incomplete message or confusing verbiage to become the focus of our study, our attentions will be towards manifesting whatever results those messages point towards. It can become a distraction that can lead to less love/light being produced by us. Because we are the lifeblood of the site, whatever we choose to focus our attention on will be the vibe that the site takes on, no matter what's posted here, really. However, additional channeled messages which compliment the LOO can add a depth to our understanding. I'm talking about messages such as those from Bashar. They provide a note that's very close to the "A note" of the LOO. This can help us to have a more precise tuning.
3) What matters more: the content of discussion or the manner in which it is being discussed?
In my experience, even discussions of the ordinary can be extraordinarily profound. The manner or attitude in or by which the topic is approached makes all the difference in the world. If you put a Buddha in hell, would he suffer?
4) What place will material that is not focused on eternal spiritual principles but rather on the transient or on the disempowering or on that which generates fear and paranoia or on the future calamity or on other temporal matters of non-enduring significance have in our forums? Do you wish to draw a line somewhere in the sand or would you rather welcome the entire spectrum of other channeled sources of material?
I think we know enough of disempowering material already! I don't know about you all, but I wade through it every day! Bring4th is a haven of clarity to me. I would be tremendously disappointed to see it become muddied. However, I see the angle that you're coming from. If we can remain tuned, that stuff can be posted and just as swiftly be allowed to fall away. Drawing a line in the sand would be a logical attempt to solve an illogical problem. I don't think it would work.
5) More specifically, is it acceptable to dedicate threads to analyzing philosophy concerned with baby-eating reptile-humanoids (an analysis which would happen through the lens of the Law of One) as long as the discussion is carried forward with the spirit of mutual respect so prevalent on the forums?
Who ultimately can decide what is acceptable, to think about, talk about, whatever? I think, as long as we can lightheartedly and respectfully discuss mini-golf through the lens of the LOO, we can maintain that nature as we discuss baby-eating reptile-humanoids, or anything else under the sun, from the LOO standpoint.
Thank you, and good luck with the preparations!
My input:
1) When mixed or negative material begins making its entrance into our forums, what possible consequences can you foresee in terms of our tuning?
Negative material can severely lessen the positive impact of the Ra and Q'uo material. With the new forum, it's possible that the site may become a jumbled mess of channeled messages coming from everywhere and speaking in many different styles of communication. I feel that the basic idea behind the site (the study of the Law of One in order to best learn how to bring forth your love and bring 4th density) could be lost in the cacophony. A good analogy would be like placing a lampshade over an uncovered bulb.
2) What constitutes detuning? (Loss of tuning.)
That's a very good question. I think we all know what love is and how to manifest it in our lives. I think this is because we are all able to draw the same basic message from the LOO material. If we allow other material that contains an incomplete message or confusing verbiage to become the focus of our study, our attentions will be towards manifesting whatever results those messages point towards. It can become a distraction that can lead to less love/light being produced by us. Because we are the lifeblood of the site, whatever we choose to focus our attention on will be the vibe that the site takes on, no matter what's posted here, really. However, additional channeled messages which compliment the LOO can add a depth to our understanding. I'm talking about messages such as those from Bashar. They provide a note that's very close to the "A note" of the LOO. This can help us to have a more precise tuning.
3) What matters more: the content of discussion or the manner in which it is being discussed?
In my experience, even discussions of the ordinary can be extraordinarily profound. The manner or attitude in or by which the topic is approached makes all the difference in the world. If you put a Buddha in hell, would he suffer?
4) What place will material that is not focused on eternal spiritual principles but rather on the transient or on the disempowering or on that which generates fear and paranoia or on the future calamity or on other temporal matters of non-enduring significance have in our forums? Do you wish to draw a line somewhere in the sand or would you rather welcome the entire spectrum of other channeled sources of material?
I think we know enough of disempowering material already! I don't know about you all, but I wade through it every day! Bring4th is a haven of clarity to me. I would be tremendously disappointed to see it become muddied. However, I see the angle that you're coming from. If we can remain tuned, that stuff can be posted and just as swiftly be allowed to fall away.
Drawing a line in the sand would be a logical attempt to solve an illogical problem. I don't think it would work. 5) More specifically, is it acceptable to dedicate threads to analyzing philosophy concerned with baby-eating reptile-humanoids (an analysis which would happen through the lens of the Law of One) as long as the discussion is carried forward with the spirit of mutual respect so prevalent on the forums?
Who ultimately can decide what is acceptable, to think about, talk about, whatever? I think, as long as we can lightheartedly and respectfully discuss mini-golf through the lens of the LOO, we can maintain that nature as we discuss baby-eating reptile-humanoids, or anything else under the sun, from the LOO standpoint.
Thank you, and good luck with the preparations!