09-12-2015, 05:43 AM
Well, these concepts seem kind of circular to me, it just doesn't make sense in my mind the way you describe although I can see the construction. The problem for me is that to me the Truth IS Mystery. Everything known contains everything unknown. But that is still kind of beside what I mean by Mystery, I guess I just don't have proper words in this language.
I admit I don't get why everyone is so attached to the idea of Love having to be present from the beginning of all things, especially since Ra laid out that Logos is Love which is rarified Free Will that came from awareness. Why the insistance that Love had to be there before Free Will? It just seems to be reaching in fear, but maybe I misperceive.
That's very different understanding of things from what I see. The Law of One, to me, is not the Original Thought at all, but it is a description of a nature within reality, just as all the 'Laws' are. It's like a peoples that get named after they are extinct. Everybody will call them that name, but they may have never called themselves that. I don't think the universe considers itself to be ruled by the Law of One, the Law of One is a description made by enties of their perception of reality.
The Law of One therefore really just describes what is continuous, unending in experience. It is the only reference we have for the possibility of infinity.
So, that being said, I think the Original Thought is a subset of the Law of One and not the other way around. Really, if the Law of One is a subset of anything else then it is deceitful in name because then it doesn't pertain to absolute unity.
I admit I don't get why everyone is so attached to the idea of Love having to be present from the beginning of all things, especially since Ra laid out that Logos is Love which is rarified Free Will that came from awareness. Why the insistance that Love had to be there before Free Will? It just seems to be reaching in fear, but maybe I misperceive.
That's very different understanding of things from what I see. The Law of One, to me, is not the Original Thought at all, but it is a description of a nature within reality, just as all the 'Laws' are. It's like a peoples that get named after they are extinct. Everybody will call them that name, but they may have never called themselves that. I don't think the universe considers itself to be ruled by the Law of One, the Law of One is a description made by enties of their perception of reality.
The Law of One therefore really just describes what is continuous, unending in experience. It is the only reference we have for the possibility of infinity.
So, that being said, I think the Original Thought is a subset of the Law of One and not the other way around. Really, if the Law of One is a subset of anything else then it is deceitful in name because then it doesn't pertain to absolute unity.