11-10-2015, 03:42 PM
(11-10-2015, 03:31 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: So, why would Gandalf (and, another cat that Ra is speaking of - I don't think it's Fairchild, however, because Ra later says Fairchild is not yet harvestable) continue to incarnate as cats if they couldn't continue their third density lessons with great investment in this lifetime as a previously harvested individual?
And this quote says that, because Gandalf and the other cat are 3D, Don, Carla, and Jim could recognize love between them. Wouldn't that say, if we can recognize love being exhibited by a 2D being, that it is of 3D orientation?
Being of a "3rd density orientation" is different from being "a 3rd density entity". In this case, the animal was 3rd density harvestable, but apparently incarnated as a pet again because it wanted to continue to explore its relationship with them.
(11-10-2015, 03:31 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: That's fair enough if you don't believe that the aforementioned animals are 3rd density. But, how do you feel the apes that are inhabited by Maldek souls?
They are 3rd density souls, but unable to express it in their 2nd density bodies. It doesn't have the right brain for that. That was part of their karmic amelioration. Keep in mind, they had a bunch of 3rd density incarnations before being in those animal bodies. A whole different scenario.
(11-10-2015, 03:31 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: Could we not say the same thing for humans? Instinctual attachment to our children and whatnot? The addictive flood of dopamine and oxytocin to the brain when a child is born that causes extreme attachment to the parents who are present? A lack of consideration for doing anything outside of its "programming"? My only argument is that we are not so different after all...
Sure, we have all that, and then some. Animals just aren't dealing with identity issues. That is a big part of human relationships. Forming identities. We are different from them, and there are similarities. It is an equal mixture of the two.