Questions regarding the LOO, STS and Religions

[Monica]

When I started to see the big picture and understand, I thought it was my job to convince others in my life to get on the path, and discover the truths that I was discovering. What a rude awakening…it doesn’t work that way.

I had the same experience! I realized that I had retained the 'must evangelize' pattern and it sure didn't work!

As I processed these issues and got more into the Law of One I realized that so many of the people I knew in mainstream religions are so polarized STO, that it wasn’t really necessary that I convince them of anything, They were already where they needed to be for the harvest.

Agreed!

Me trying to evangelize or convince them unsolicited of my truth was just going to depolarize me.

And maybe depolarize them too, by triggering fear.

I started to realize that my job was to be a light worker, by being myself, as purely and fully as I can. Which means chakras open and bright , energy flowing, and not suppressing, repressing, or oppressing others with my energy.

Agreed! I'm still wondering whether about the effects of suppressing parts of who we are (what we believe) in their presence.

---

entities who are inclined to find love, or in the path of positive, would find love wherever they are. the religion doesnt have anything to do with that.

I agree with the first statement but not the second. I don't think we can exclude religion as an influence. It's a catalyst, like everything else in 3D.

If you think religion can negatively affect entities, then why couldn't it also positively affect entities?

Or are you saying that the people immersed in religion, but who have found the positive, can influence others positively, but the institution of religion itself can't? Is that what you are saying?

participating in a negative hierarchy is not experiencing a catalyst. catalyst would be the religions' rigid control, and negativity. not the act of participating in them. if you join the ranks, even if you dont participate, you will have participated in empowering a negative hierarchy.

...and creating catalyst for others, rather than being affected by the catalyst?

Or, might it be both?

for, as we know from the excerpts that talk about negative hierarchies in Ra material, the empowerment of the negative enslaver is proportional to the power of the enslaved. enslavement, as far as i understand, has infinite levels as anything else -> enslavement doesnt need to be how emperor palpatine subdues anakin skywalker. if, a negative controlling entity or group, or concept, in any way whatsoever, makes one entity accept their domination partially, they would still reap the benefit of that partial subjugation. 1 billion people subjecting themselves partially to the power and principles of a controlling hierarchy that is influenced by a negative outside source, i reckon, would still provide noticeable power to that negative outside source.

That's disconcerting.

However, the control isn't total.

those souls were already 4 d harvested entities 21,500 years or so before inception of any caanan religion on earth, in case we are talking about various saints and apostles like theresa, augustine etc.

Hmmm....good point. Do we know that those 'saints' were all harvested in the previous cycle?

my concern is entities that are of higher frequency or wanderer or more advanced in nature, and still being burdened or hampered by these negative influenced conditionings and dogmas in varying degrees, proportionally decreasing their manifestation of whatever they have came here for. as we know from the talk about negative influences' targets in Ra text, that, wanderers and higher frequency entities are priority for negative influences.

So you aren't proposing that we cram the Law of One down the throats of religious fundamentalists?

i think those you speak of will choose what they will and 'help' should not be taken to them unless they ask and what. as i said, my concern is about those who had accessed and called purer thoughts and philosophies and got the means (like Ra text), but still insist on not letting go of the less pure ones now.

Thank you for the clarification!