12-11-2015, 02:23 AM
(12-11-2015, 01:14 AM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote: Austin and I are making an attempt at drafting a new introduction to the Law of One.
I wish you success in convincing a wider audience to struggle past the various hardships and impediments the text offers to its readers such as the idiosyncratic vocabulary (densities, etc.), the factual errors (discussed in places in the forum), the fragmentary nature of the text, the homophobia (as it would be interpreted) and whatever else that makes it such a demanding read. (One friend felt the designation "the instrument" was a derogation.) I don't think anyone I've ever commended it to has ever dug deeply into it...much to my personal disappointment.
As an aside, given the devotion to the text required to penetrate it, it's curious to me that a collection of earthlings willing to squeeze through those barriers would end up being as unaligned with one another as those who have populated this forum over the years. I would have expected more focus and synergy than what I have observed and felt among a supposed gathering of upper density wanderers. Although there is some, I would have expected it to be more cogent. I suppose it's a testimony to the success of the forgetting process and the intensity of the illusion. (In other words, folks like me sure can get distorted hanging out in this corner of the universe!)
By the way, just curious: what's "supra-ordinate" supposed to mean? I can't fathom it. Did you intend "supra-ordinal?"