09-21-2010, 09:11 AM
(09-20-2010, 07:32 PM)Etude in B Minor Wrote: Thus, it is the expression of the potential that I was referring to when I said that infinity does not have to include everything. Ali's "totality" could refer to the expression of the creator, which would be of a lesser order of infinity (but still infinite) than the infinity of the potential. Or it could refer to the infinity of the potential, which to my mind is somewhat meaningless. It is in the expression that the creator knows itself.
OK, I will stop here before I approach infinite post length!
Peace out...
infinity necessarily has to imply everything, and things that are 'not', and then infinity.
else, it cant be infinite.
'infinity in potential', or any lesser order of infinity, would not be infinite, since they would be missing a particular aspect (their counterpart) in the infinite.
it feels like you are taking infinity, in the sense of space.