Hypothesis: All dimensions provide protection uniquely

[The_Tired_Philosopher]

I think protection of the body is a misnomer, because it's an illusion anyway, so what's there to protect?

The other self is self, so it's a moot point saying you'll protect yourself from another self.

Hit the nail on the head.

I would relate this idea of protection to 'shells' or containers like the Matryoksha dolls. Each density contains and 'protects' the space of all the other densities. Just like how the skin protects the muscles and flesh, the muscles protect the organs, the organs protect cellular processes, which are protected by their cell membranes, etc. Take away any part of the chain and the whole system falls apart.

They've taken away plenty, the whole thing only collapses if you take away all of one thing, and even then, your body might just rebuild it if it can.

I can accept protection as a chosen way of being/performing.  I do not think its fair to the thousands slaughtered in just our history to write them off as not being protected enough or good enough protectors.

Protection.  Its like wearing armor, its a way of being, not a Way/Law of the Universe.  What's protection to us might be infringement to a 5D or 6D entity.

Quite honestly though, I'm a split ( / ) mindset.  I see the ideal of protection in regards to comfort.

Otherwise, I'm constantly furious that we're still so unevolved we require protection from our own selves just to be comfortable.

I couldn't even make sense of it, sometimes I feel like y'all are in Universe Unconditional Love, and I'm over here in Universe DARKESTBRIGHTESTARGHHHH.

But still.  i Think Protection is a concept ennacted, not an inherent part of the hidden or otherwise 'intelligent' design of the Universe.

I think it depends how you play your game. According to Ra the positive polarity is afforded natural protection whereas negative polarity is not. I presume that those who still lie within the zone of indifference also do not get the exact protection that positive polarity receives.

I think this is because Third Density is all about the choice and catalytic experiences revolve around this choice. I see the physical as the 'last occuring plane' so whatever plays out here is a manifestation of decisions already made on other levels.

The question really, is can you accept the atrocity of an event, accept it is valid and still feel compassionate? Most people would say not because they identify compassion with sympathy and thus, how could you accept something horrible under compassion without also rejecting its innate nature?

However, I believe the issue is in the idea of justification. You can accept something without needing to justify it. Just like you can hate something without needing to justify it. I don't need to justify an event as being 'positive or negative' based to identify with the individuals and feel compassion. I also am not strictly biased towards obvious victims. I see a victim in every perpetrator and thus also feel compassion for then. I feel compassion for both predator and prey, for monsters and saints, for good and evil.

Does the negative path not also have protection...

I accept, doesn't mean I agree but its not my place to agree, only to accept.
Its made me a pretty gray person.

I wouldn't call love and unity protectors, I think the natural mechanics of polarity allow for 'protection' if you realize a natural wall of magnetism repulsing can be said to be protection, when its really not made as protection but just has that benefit of keeping back things as if protecting (when its not, its just being as it will).

I don't even view it as a doll in a doll.

I mean, if by protection you mean your Higher Self can deprogram events too.  I would accept that.  Otherwise, just leading you around those events.  Is like...

Oh dear God.  I'm.  An escort mission for my Higher Self lol

Listen man, I think I live in Hell and even I don't think this planet is a prison o: