The Philosophy of No Darkness

[Night Owl]

If something is a thing, there is light, no darkness.

If there is nothing, it is dark and we must cease speaking.

The middle of this is confusion, veiling being released.

This also makes me wonder: if we can't speak about what is dark, if it's really become so intractable, as it were, and ontologically unsound, then how can we make use of the experience?

This is a fundamental dichotomy I've pondered ever since I found the Law of One: the idea of the illusion as instrumental to some larger telos vs. the idea of the illusion as an obstacle to that larger end?  Is the illusion to be integrated and balanced or overcome and conquered?

That has been on my mind for a while too