Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Spiritual Development & Metaphysical Matters Contentions about 'Polarity'

    Thread: Contentions about 'Polarity'


    Aion (Offline)

    Sentinel of the LVX Decad
    Posts: 4,760
    Threads: 45
    Joined: Apr 2015
    #57
    02-03-2016, 03:22 PM
    (02-03-2016, 03:10 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote:
    (02-03-2016, 02:56 PM)Aion Wrote:
    (02-03-2016, 02:08 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: From the way I see things, to be exempt of the system we exist within one would need to suceed in harvesting negatively all the way through the Octave.

    To put this another way, rather than liberating in harmony the individualization within the Logos, one would need to asborb the Logos from within it's individualization.

    Except on the octave level time/space and space/time literally permeate eachother and there is no difference between inner and outer. Either way they're touching the same thing and I have yet to see anybody give any reasonable explanation as to how a negative would avoid the need to repolarize in 6D. Lots of nifty word concepts and ideation but nothing that holds up to logic.

    Well this was meant as food for thought. I see it as a strong enough rejection of the Logos from within Itself.

    I believe you have said in a thread that you believe it is the honor of a single entity to harvest negatively from this Octave. Compared it to Galactus if I remember correctly.

    Yes, I have said that before but I believe that entity still goes through the release process because you can't move through the gateway octave so long as you hold a polarized charge. However, I don't view it as any sort of rejection, because it is a total realization of all within. The honour of that negative entity is to discover the complete Logos within and at that moment the entity no longer perceives separation between self and other self and instantly all others come to be identified as solely the self. However, because of so much self-orientation and study of love and wisdom through 4D and 5D that at that moment the love for self suddenly encompasses all.

    This is what I see as the successful candidate. Those many who will fail will cling to their separation from others and be unable to absorb all in to the love of self and so need to go the outside route of releasing negative polarity to finish in positive. The successful one will encounter the positive force within which matches their negative polarity. This sounds easy in concept, but the nature of mind necessary to follow this path is one which must be able to maintain its integrity. I think if anything this idea is more dangerous in the sense that people might start to try and either just end up negatively polarized or go insane.

    By juxtaposition, it can then be seen that all of those who progress on the positive end also eventually discover the negative charge within and so balance. I believe that is the process of moving in to 6D. However, positive goes in to it already well-versed in the process and modes of integration.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Plenum - 02-01-2016, 04:11 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Adonai One - 02-01-2016, 04:59 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-01-2016, 05:01 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Plenum - 02-01-2016, 05:19 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-01-2016, 10:46 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Adonai One - 02-02-2016, 01:49 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Adonai One - 02-01-2016, 05:22 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-01-2016, 07:31 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Plenum - 02-01-2016, 08:09 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by AnthroHeart - 02-01-2016, 08:40 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-01-2016, 11:26 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-01-2016, 11:56 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-02-2016, 01:09 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 12:06 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Jade - 02-02-2016, 11:25 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-02-2016, 01:50 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-02-2016, 03:52 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-02-2016, 02:21 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-02-2016, 02:23 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 02:58 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-02-2016, 03:39 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 03:51 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-02-2016, 04:01 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-02-2016, 04:09 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 04:49 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-02-2016, 05:13 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 03:14 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-02-2016, 03:19 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Adonai One - 02-02-2016, 03:50 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-02-2016, 03:57 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-02-2016, 10:04 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by spero - 02-02-2016, 01:27 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by AnthroHeart - 02-02-2016, 02:00 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Jade - 02-02-2016, 02:08 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-02-2016, 02:54 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by AnthroHeart - 02-02-2016, 03:13 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Jade - 02-03-2016, 01:25 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-02-2016, 08:13 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by spero - 02-02-2016, 10:28 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-03-2016, 12:53 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-03-2016, 09:59 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-03-2016, 01:09 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-03-2016, 10:04 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-03-2016, 01:12 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-03-2016, 01:26 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by APeacefulWarrior - 02-03-2016, 01:27 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by spero - 02-03-2016, 01:51 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-03-2016, 11:47 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by anagogy - 02-03-2016, 02:43 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 01:00 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Jade - 02-03-2016, 01:03 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 02:08 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Aion - 02-03-2016, 02:56 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 03:10 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Aion - 02-03-2016, 03:22 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 04:42 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by AnthroHeart - 02-03-2016, 02:22 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Aion - 02-03-2016, 02:53 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 10:06 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Night Owl - 02-03-2016, 09:45 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by AnthroHeart - 02-03-2016, 09:48 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 09:59 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Night Owl - 02-03-2016, 10:00 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Minyatur - 02-03-2016, 10:15 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Night Owl - 02-03-2016, 10:37 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-03-2016, 11:47 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-04-2016, 08:03 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Night Owl - 02-04-2016, 04:10 AM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by The_Tired_Philosopher - 02-04-2016, 06:08 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by rva_jeremy - 02-04-2016, 06:39 PM
    RE: Contentions about 'Polarity' - by Jade - 02-04-2016, 06:26 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode