I think that's an interesting line of thought. It falls in line with the Two Paths/Lovers card - where you must decide whether you 'plunder' your subconscious/higher self for its resources or 'court it like a maiden' in a delicate, intentional way. I wouldn't say that it's solely a problem of the negative entity, though - the Two Paths card has the "wobble" effect, which traps one in the sinkhole, which I think is probably the more likely situation when one is attempting to invoke their magical personality too often without the proper energetic configurations.
So, I'll best try to describe what I think it means to not take off the magical personality and what can go wrong. When we do what would be considered "high magical work", like, banishing rituals, or healing meditations, or healing of others, in those moments we are invoking our higher self to help with those workings. It can be conscious or unconscious. The problem comes when we try to carry this state of being, this 'higher', almost non-polarized part of our being through our earth-suits through extended periods of time and during mundane tasks, when one is not ready - when one has not properly cleared and begun crystallizing their chakras. If a neophyte tries to act as a guru at all times, they will mess up, and if they are still attempting to wear their "higher-self hat", their higher-self contact gets depolarized much in the way that the Ra contact gets depolarized when things take on a more transient or philosophically negative slant. Then, the next time you go to link up with your 'higher self', instead you may get the 'imitation higher self', which is where problems can start - guidance gets muddled and confused, because we're confused about what acts are truly beneficial to involve our higher self and which aren't, and because polarity is a subtle thing to understand.
Ra says it's about slowly increasing the percentage in a gradual way, to letting the magical personality reign more and more. Forcing it is when people go wrong. I would say it would be forcing energy to the indigo when there isn't enough energy in the lower centers to keep them balanced.
So, I'll best try to describe what I think it means to not take off the magical personality and what can go wrong. When we do what would be considered "high magical work", like, banishing rituals, or healing meditations, or healing of others, in those moments we are invoking our higher self to help with those workings. It can be conscious or unconscious. The problem comes when we try to carry this state of being, this 'higher', almost non-polarized part of our being through our earth-suits through extended periods of time and during mundane tasks, when one is not ready - when one has not properly cleared and begun crystallizing their chakras. If a neophyte tries to act as a guru at all times, they will mess up, and if they are still attempting to wear their "higher-self hat", their higher-self contact gets depolarized much in the way that the Ra contact gets depolarized when things take on a more transient or philosophically negative slant. Then, the next time you go to link up with your 'higher self', instead you may get the 'imitation higher self', which is where problems can start - guidance gets muddled and confused, because we're confused about what acts are truly beneficial to involve our higher self and which aren't, and because polarity is a subtle thing to understand.
Ra says it's about slowly increasing the percentage in a gradual way, to letting the magical personality reign more and more. Forcing it is when people go wrong. I would say it would be forcing energy to the indigo when there isn't enough energy in the lower centers to keep them balanced.
Quote:75.38 Questioner: Now the invocation of the magical personality is not necessarily effective for the neophyte. Is there a point at which there is a definite quantum change and that personality does then reside, or can it be done in small degrees or percentages of magical personality as the neophyte becomes more adept?
Ra: I am Ra. The latter is correct.