The process of 'invalidating'

[Plenum]

so if i get this straight, youve uncovered a thoughtform thats repulsive enough that you cannot bring yourself to indulge exploring it, so youve taken to metaphysically removing it in a manner that would be similar to control/judgment/rejection?

well, this process of exploration was more about uncovering things already done, and trying to comprehend the why's and wherefore's.

In terms of the 'repulsion', it was not that it was repulsive as a quality; it was the fact that it couldn't be seated within the self in any way.

how does invalidation fit into all this. does it lack appreciation of the rejected material for example

this kind of 'invalidating' that I described in the OP is probably of a stronger quality than the usual usage of this word would imply. That's why I tried to explain a bit more about the circumstances, and how it related to the indigo level.

I also tried to bring in the fact that it is not of a negative nature, in terms of polarization, because it's not an actual usage of catalyst, but more a response of impotency, and lack of incorporation.  I would say that it is primarily defensive in nature (self-protective of consciousness), and hence at it's further reaches, ties into the schizophrenic mechanism.  That's still a tentative theory on my part, and I'm definitely open to other theories explaining that particular condition.

I would say it's not about 'lacking appreciation' of the rejected template.  It's more that the self is so confronted by it, it causes some fracturing of thought process.  But the template is not the issue.  It's the self that can't handle it.

why is it ok to bring about the desired mbs complex through fasting or other healing modalities but not through direct manipulation of the template at indigo.

the templates I'm talking about here are not the individual templates.  The way I'm using this term is closer to the archetypal level of structuration.  Those structures themselves cannot be altered; they are fundamental.  The only thing that can be attempted to alter is the perceptual interface to these structures.  And so the invalidating here is an attempt to take a local representation of these fundamental templates, and then dismantle it.  

As I said, the term 'invalidating', in the sense I am using it (it was the best word I could find, given the situation), expresses a desire to un-exist something.  And by that, I don't mean a physical manifestation; but a kind of denial/abnegation that says it doesn't exist.

The only reason one would do so, if it was so overwhelming, the only way to 'cope' is to say it doesn't exist.