03-04-2016, 12:41 AM
(03-04-2016, 12:13 AM)anagogy Wrote:(03-03-2016, 11:29 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Pretty much what I said, all is love/light and light/love however you want to define it. The main problem with your perspective is that you try to define it as otherwise.
I actually never said that anything in particular was not love/light or light/love, let alone negative polarity. But we have to get specific when talking about those terms, and "love-light" is not the same as "green ray" love. One is more of a creative force, whereas the other is compassion. And I have no problem with those quotes you shared. But earlier it seemed like you had a problem with the quotes where Ra directly stated the negative path was more dependent on illusion. So which is it? Do you agree with Ra or not? You can't quote them as truth, and then deny it the next second. Otherwise, you are just cherry picking ideas and inventing your own philosophy.
"The polarities are both dependent upon a limited viewpoint. However, the negative polarity depends more heavily upon the illusory separation betwixt the self and all other mind/body/spirit complexes."
I simply stated that I believe those of Ra also have their own focus upon illusions, of course it is easier to see the distortions of others than our own but Ra did say that they are still walking the steps of light which implies they also have things to let go of to move forward. The polarities take in each other, so although it is stated to be easier for those of the light they still do need to take within themselves the other polarity as part of what they are, hence that it also is what is.
I don't disagree with Ra material but make a distinction between when they speak of the Law of One and when they speak through bias of certain experiences which is not in total harmony with how they have themselves stated the Law of One. They speak of truth just as they give opinions. Those of Ra are small even all together if you just take a look at the stars and think that they came from just a nearby planet. They also are with a background of their own which was so bathed in an overabundance of compassion that the only ones who harvested negatively were two 5D positive wanderers that had intended to help with the positive harvest. They also never saw the importance of the fool's archetype which shows they did not really have any opportunity to lean toward the negative path in their experience.