(10-01-2010, 10:32 AM)unity100 Wrote: the wanderers you speak of, have changed their polarity and became negative. they have gone all the way back to 3d vibration, and into negative. when they became 'native' 3d entities with their polarity reduction, they already have necessitated a harvest, because, in Ra's terms, they have melded with planetary vibrations.
ie, they have gone back, in the densities.
they are the only examples we know of as such, not to mention that the 'harvest' business for wanderers only comes up, and ends with their example. nowhere in Ra material harvest necessity for wanderers are being discussed.
actually, telling these entities wanderers is a bit off place. since, they have probably gone astray from their mission, intent, and even polarity, when they incarnated as wanderers.
I see. And given I assumed you would have an answer readily available, I availed myself to the task of suggesting in my above post the scenario first, as a thought experiment, by taking these two wanderers out of a negative harvest, and rather hypothetically place them into a positive harvest instead, by suggesting that presumably had these 5D STO positive Wanderers depolarized slightly, but remained STO, they may have instead graduated into 4D positive, rather than remain at 3D. In this case being negative would have nothing to do with your response if they graduated positive. They would have Harvested from 3D positive to 4D positive. As always, I remain as curious to your responses.
unity Wrote:actually, telling these entities wanderers is a bit off placeIt is as interesting to note that you are assisting Ra, as well as all of us here at B4th, for which I'm sure there might be some who surely thank you and support you, for clearing up any confusion that the Ra SMC may have created, this by making it clearer that their naming these two as STO Wanderers from 5D might have been an error on their part.