03-29-2016, 01:06 PM
GentleWanderer Wrote:It comes back to seeking love in every moment. I wonder if buddhist "detachement" is the same as Ra "acceptance".
This is interesting, I haven't actually thought of it this way, but I think you are right.
GentleWanderer Wrote:The thing is, 'acceptance' or 'detachment' is not something you can 'do'. It's the end result or final state of the processing of the emotional charge associated with personally impinging events - "someone taking something personally'.
So trying to force acceptance without doing the actual inner work is kinda pointless and non-productive.
I agree, in my opinion it's the result of much balancing. I find that trying to understand someones behaviour, to dig a little deeper, helps with acceptance.
Quote:Questioner: I will attempt to make an analogy. If an animal, shall I say a bull in a pen, attacks you because you have wandered into his pen, you get out of his way rapidly but you do not blame him. Or, you do not have much of an emotional response other than the fear response that he might damage you. However, if you encounter another self in his territory and he attacks you, your response may be more of an emotional nature creating physical bodily responses. Am I correct in assuming that when your response to the animal and to the other-self seeing both as the Creator and loving both and understanding their action in attacking you is the action of their free will then you have balanced yourself correctly in this area? Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is basically correct. However, the balanced entity will see in the seeming attack of an other-self the causes of this action which are, in most cases, of a more complex nature than the cause of the attack of the second-density bull as was your example. Thus this balanced entity would be open to many more opportunities for service to a third-density other-self.