Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material The "withheld" topic

    Thread: The "withheld" topic


    Jade (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 3,351
    Threads: 61
    Joined: Jun 2013
    #15
    04-18-2016, 09:38 AM (This post was last modified: 04-18-2016, 09:42 AM by Jade.)
    The reason it's difficult for Ra to talk about indigo energy transfers is because you are speaking of infinity. The infinite amount of possibilities available while using indigo energies makes it difficult to describe. You see incarnated people here trying to describe indigo ray energy and the words just aren't available.

    The veil is an artificial limit on our abilities. When Ra refuses to talk about something esoteric/indigo ray or gives lofty language to describe it, it is because they are veiling it. Our own personal process of "lowering the veil" is what we are attempting each as a personal effort. For Ra to give away all the secrets of the indigo ray would be a huge infringement, because we accept the veil so that it surprises us.

    I'm having trouble finding where Ra mentions there still being a veil in the later densities, and I'm not sure I can find that or if it's something I invented. I did find a quote where Ra said "You could say the veil is lifted in 4th density" but I haven't found much else. I think I was more referring to the idea that a 4th density entity has some veiling yet of its future self in 6th density +. I may have improperly used "veil" for "limitations of vibration" or something. If I find anything, I will let you know.

    The discussion of the veil is heavy in the 70s and 80s, it's a lot of Don's pre-work with the archetypes, as he balances considerations of the m/b/s before the veil and after.

    I think Ooo's description of a "quasi-veil" was more of what I was likely referring to. The effects of the veiling carry over. But I also believe I was attempting to describe some type of limit of awareness in 4th density, in relation to the original question being "how does an entity in higher densities have ignorance of its soul-plan?"

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-15-2016, 07:21 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by 1109 - 04-16-2016, 02:57 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Jade - 04-16-2016, 09:06 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by APeacefulWarrior - 04-16-2016, 09:50 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by APeacefulWarrior - 04-16-2016, 09:52 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by anagogy - 04-16-2016, 10:11 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Zach - 09-21-2017, 11:56 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Verum Occultum - 04-16-2016, 02:49 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-16-2016, 09:17 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Parsons - 04-16-2016, 10:30 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-18-2016, 08:15 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Ooo - 04-18-2016, 09:37 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by 1109 - 04-17-2016, 01:14 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by third-density-being - 04-17-2016, 05:55 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Minyatur - 04-18-2016, 09:27 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Jade - 04-18-2016, 09:38 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-18-2016, 11:12 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by APeacefulWarrior - 04-18-2016, 12:35 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-18-2016, 10:12 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 09-10-2017, 09:30 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-19-2016, 08:26 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-19-2016, 09:32 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by APeacefulWarrior - 04-19-2016, 12:57 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-20-2016, 04:44 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-19-2016, 11:30 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-19-2016, 07:57 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-20-2016, 09:34 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-20-2016, 12:20 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by third-density-being - 04-21-2016, 04:18 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Stranger - 04-23-2016, 11:35 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by APeacefulWarrior - 04-20-2016, 12:59 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Shadows n Games - 04-26-2016, 08:04 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-30-2016, 05:38 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by third-density-being - 04-30-2016, 06:12 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Rolci - 04-30-2016, 07:21 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Aaron - 04-30-2016, 11:50 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Shadows n Games - 05-03-2016, 08:44 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Minyatur - 05-03-2016, 09:05 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Infinite Unity - 05-03-2016, 09:26 AM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by YinYang - 05-03-2016, 03:44 PM
    RE: The "withheld" topic - by Jade - 05-03-2016, 10:57 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode