04-20-2016, 01:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-20-2016, 11:39 AM by third-density-being.)
Dear Sean Hsu,
What I’ve wrote regarding “reluctance of the Higher Self” and why Ra use term space/time – it was my understanding WHY He/She/It/They used space/time and not time/space. But You are correct that it was a mistake made by Ra during the communication and my conclusion was wrong. I apologize for not enough vigilance on my side while I was replying to your post.
Since Ra Materials in it’s original form permits to draw quite clear understanding regarding relations of space/time and time/space – and an entire matter for Being being lured into negative time/space, I concluded that everything is clear.
In your first post You’ve pointed out mistakes/inconsistencies that are present within the Ra Materials – which in fact do exist – on both sides of Don and Ra’s, but they are followed by questions/answers that clarifies all misunderstandings.
The question now is what are the attitudes toward those “imperfections” within the Material.
The Ra Materials are – above all – a conversation between two Beings, supported by Service of Carla, Jim and Others, that We do not know about. For me personally, mistakes made by both – Don and Ra – during this conversations were/are very important. In fact, I think it would be more difficult for me to accept this material without them.
It all comes to individual background of All and Each of Us. I rejected concept of “God” long ago and I could not accept it’s “different version” – which in some way would seem to me as such, if Ra Materials were “flawless”. RA is/are no more “God” than Each One of Us. They ARE imperfect and He/She/It/They DO possess limitations, as We All do. It may be strange, but I needed to see/experience those limitations my-Self, and via such mistakes I was able to.
Mistakes/Inconsistencies within this Material carries information about the contact itself, as well as about All it’s Participants. I wasn’t around for a while and from You I’ve find out about plans of editing Ra Materials, which I think is a very bad idea. As I wrote before, mistakes made during this contact also carries informative-value and to change them would be to taint the Ra Materials. In my opinion this is unacceptable and should never be done.
Even a compromise, such as “adding notes” between questions/answers, is something I’m not agreeing upon, as this would suggest certain understanding to the Reader, and by that it would infringe His/Her freedom of formulating His/Her own understanding, without any suggestions.
To conclude my answer to your query: Yes, there are imperfections / contradictions within the content of the Ra Materials, but based on an entire conversation they are clarified within it as well. Also, in my opinion, those imperfection / contradictions possess value and should not be changed under any circumstances.
All I have Best in me for You
What I’ve wrote regarding “reluctance of the Higher Self” and why Ra use term space/time – it was my understanding WHY He/She/It/They used space/time and not time/space. But You are correct that it was a mistake made by Ra during the communication and my conclusion was wrong. I apologize for not enough vigilance on my side while I was replying to your post.
Since Ra Materials in it’s original form permits to draw quite clear understanding regarding relations of space/time and time/space – and an entire matter for Being being lured into negative time/space, I concluded that everything is clear.
In your first post You’ve pointed out mistakes/inconsistencies that are present within the Ra Materials – which in fact do exist – on both sides of Don and Ra’s, but they are followed by questions/answers that clarifies all misunderstandings.
The question now is what are the attitudes toward those “imperfections” within the Material.
The Ra Materials are – above all – a conversation between two Beings, supported by Service of Carla, Jim and Others, that We do not know about. For me personally, mistakes made by both – Don and Ra – during this conversations were/are very important. In fact, I think it would be more difficult for me to accept this material without them.
It all comes to individual background of All and Each of Us. I rejected concept of “God” long ago and I could not accept it’s “different version” – which in some way would seem to me as such, if Ra Materials were “flawless”. RA is/are no more “God” than Each One of Us. They ARE imperfect and He/She/It/They DO possess limitations, as We All do. It may be strange, but I needed to see/experience those limitations my-Self, and via such mistakes I was able to.
Mistakes/Inconsistencies within this Material carries information about the contact itself, as well as about All it’s Participants. I wasn’t around for a while and from You I’ve find out about plans of editing Ra Materials, which I think is a very bad idea. As I wrote before, mistakes made during this contact also carries informative-value and to change them would be to taint the Ra Materials. In my opinion this is unacceptable and should never be done.
Even a compromise, such as “adding notes” between questions/answers, is something I’m not agreeing upon, as this would suggest certain understanding to the Reader, and by that it would infringe His/Her freedom of formulating His/Her own understanding, without any suggestions.
To conclude my answer to your query: Yes, there are imperfections / contradictions within the content of the Ra Materials, but based on an entire conversation they are clarified within it as well. Also, in my opinion, those imperfection / contradictions possess value and should not be changed under any circumstances.
All I have Best in me for You
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)