10-03-2010, 11:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2010, 11:24 PM by Questioner.)
(10-03-2010, 10:52 PM)unity100 Wrote: what difference does it make, whether it is a government or not, if the government is all of the people, all of them, equally and directly, including yourself.
That's a big IF.
If you dislike the way an open source project is being run, you can leave, continue your own work with the code, and others can join you and/or the original project as they wish.
If you dislike the way a government is being run, you can get all your assets frozen, property seized, get jailed and killed.
I see these as two different things. I believe it makes sense for me to accept the definition of 3D worldly government as "that group of people who hold an effectively monopoly on the use of force over a geographic region and its inhabitants." The core of the definition is violence. This is a world away from open source or utopia.
The open source analogy is useful to my perception of what 4D+ might be like. I'll stick with that.
I don't agree with all of Wilcock's material. Regardless, I think it's reasonable to expect 4D+ to be considerably more positive, harmonious, beautiful etc. than current life. I don't have enough information to put a precise numerical value on that expectation.