Next withheld bit, although questionably so:
Questioner: I will ask you if you are familiar with a motion picture called The Ninth Configuration. Are you familiar with this?
Ra: I am Ra. We scan your mind and see this configuration called The Ninth Configuration.
Questioner: This motion picture brought out the point about which we have been talking. The Colonel had to make a decision. I was wondering about his polarization. He could have knuckled under, you might say, to the negative forces, but he chose to defend his friend instead. Is it possible for you to estimate which is more positively polarizing: to defend the positively oriented entity, or to allow suppression by the negatively oriented entities?
Ra: I am Ra. This question takes in the scope of fourth-density as well as your own and its answer may best be seen by the action of the entity called Jehoshuah, which you call Jesus. This entity was to be defended by its friends. The entity reminded its friends to put away the sword. This entity then delivered itself to be put to the physical death. The impulse to protect the loved other-self is one which persists through the fourth-density, a density abounding in compassion. More than this we cannot and need not say.
Any guesses why they felt it necessary to add that last sentence and what more there might be to say. And the meaning of "cannot" in contrast with the separately added "need not"? I think the bottom line is, there is more that could be / could have been said.
Questioner: I will ask you if you are familiar with a motion picture called The Ninth Configuration. Are you familiar with this?
Ra: I am Ra. We scan your mind and see this configuration called The Ninth Configuration.
Questioner: This motion picture brought out the point about which we have been talking. The Colonel had to make a decision. I was wondering about his polarization. He could have knuckled under, you might say, to the negative forces, but he chose to defend his friend instead. Is it possible for you to estimate which is more positively polarizing: to defend the positively oriented entity, or to allow suppression by the negatively oriented entities?
Ra: I am Ra. This question takes in the scope of fourth-density as well as your own and its answer may best be seen by the action of the entity called Jehoshuah, which you call Jesus. This entity was to be defended by its friends. The entity reminded its friends to put away the sword. This entity then delivered itself to be put to the physical death. The impulse to protect the loved other-self is one which persists through the fourth-density, a density abounding in compassion. More than this we cannot and need not say.
Any guesses why they felt it necessary to add that last sentence and what more there might be to say. And the meaning of "cannot" in contrast with the separately added "need not"? I think the bottom line is, there is more that could be / could have been said.