10-05-2010, 11:27 AM
I find this fascinating, and I struggle to comprehend. I was going to apologize for having naive questions, until I reread "No one had ever done this before." So perhaps it's OK for me to ask. 
There's a big challenge I face while reading this kind of thing - and it's the same issue when I read Lilliya's work and some others. If it's true, by its nature it's impossible for me to comprehend how a person could have altered the nature of reality and spirituality on behalf of all humanity or even all of existence. I have no recall of any experience or understanding that compares in any way to these supernatural and superhuman activities. I also can't see anything at my level that would serve as an indicator of the change.

There's a big challenge I face while reading this kind of thing - and it's the same issue when I read Lilliya's work and some others. If it's true, by its nature it's impossible for me to comprehend how a person could have altered the nature of reality and spirituality on behalf of all humanity or even all of existence. I have no recall of any experience or understanding that compares in any way to these supernatural and superhuman activities. I also can't see anything at my level that would serve as an indicator of the change.
(10-05-2010, 10:07 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: There was a trust issue, since people tend to fear privacy issues when reading someone.It's not clear to me, from this sentence, which issue (trust and privacy) is on which side of the reading (reader or those read).
Quote:We have 83% positive harvest, but it's still shifting. 29 people are so far harvested negatively.Are you saying that harvest is an ongoing process which has already begun? Does it reach different people at different times? Do people do something to invite harvest to reach them now or put it off until later?
Quote:Third density can now coexist with fourth.Does this mean those not harvestable will continue their 3D lessons on a 3D version of earth, no relocation necessary?
Quote:Archetypes are changing, in favor of energy patterns.In your terms, I picture each archetype as containing a fixed combination of energy patterns. Energy patterns would be ingredients, archetypes are standard recipes to combine these ingredients. Is it still valuable to study archetypes? If so, as one studies should one think of archetypes as changing? Should one try to guide that change in the direction of one's choice, to change the taste of the recipe?