(05-17-2016, 02:41 PM)Minyatur Wrote: While I understand your 3D-4D focus, I think it is well to think that most wanderers come from 6D to learn the balance of love and wisdom. Also, since most would be from the positive path, it is highly unlikely to me that most are here to reinforce love and compassion, but instead wisdom.
Then again, I guess it is your duty to find what you are set to learn from this sea of mirrors unto yourself.
I wholeheartedly disagree. Why would we come to this veiled, confusing experience to reinforce wisdom?
I'm not sure you saw my write-up of a recent Q'uo channeling, but it addresses this point of view.
Quote:Q'uo: Folly is not the same thing as love, but in a world which is defined too much by wisdom, it can seem folly to love at all. Therefore, we might say that it is indeed the greater act of wisdom to allow wisdom itself to be curtailed in the face of love. It is never wrong to inquire about the modes in which love may reasonably be expected to have sway in particular kinds of circumstances. It is never an untoward question to ask whether the loved one feels in one’s heart would be well received, but there is a moment in which the bubbling up of love from within will not be denied, and a wisdom that counsels it is better not to take a chance, which refuses to allow that expression, is not the greater part of wisdom.
Life itself, however, is a chance, and love is its main chance. And so even those who have become wise with the passing of years, with the passing of generations, must realize in the end that the greatest gift that life has to offer is the gift that surpasses understanding, is the gift that puts one in relation to the mystery of being, and the more open the heart is, the more that mystery can be plumbed. It is a mystery that perpetually confounds the understanding. It is a mystery that cannot be made the subject of any wisdom.
We would say that wisdom has its place; we would say that sound judgment is never to be despised, but if judgment is given full and sole sway, that is precisely the first step on the path to a mode of service which contracts itself merely to the parameters of the serving self. That self which seeks to serve, not solely, its thus-contracted self, must be the blossom that opens itself in love to the creation, and must therefore be foolish precisely to that extent.
http://llresearch.org/transcripts/issues..._0326.aspx