05-18-2016, 03:21 PM
The only thing I can answer is that nothing you have just said is wrong or distorted. I agree with it on the relativity scale. You provide the best information there is to understand about Ra's analogy. I just think I don't treat my intuition or someone I love that way and still think my way of doing it is STO and in allignment with good intentions and some specifically chosen paths to walk towards the lesson I am here to learn. And I think the transformation of the mind still occurs.
I guess some of the misunderstanding has been focused a lot on what courting means and forgive me for that, I was likely projecting personal favorite distortions of mine. But I realize now that in fact, the word is subject to personal interpretation just like tarot and is beside the point.
What I was trying to say is that for both situtations I think I have a personal way of doing things that I think is better for me than both courting and plundering. So it becomes somewhat irrelevant if it is better to plunder or court because I find I can do better than both. Not that I am better, but that I have a better way for me. Just like the worshiping you mention, one can choose between different subtle variations of putting creation on a pedestal, I think my way of praising creation would be better than worshiping if worshiping was the general term. In fact that's what I think my intuition has teached me, is that the best way I can do anything is never found on the general path. The best way I can be of service, the best way I can love, the best way I can radiate is not the way that seems obvious or the way that most people would use on an easy path therefore I must explore where there is still no paths. I don't think astrology defines me but I think it is funny I have 7x capricorn in my chart. It says I am not here for any easy path. I refine love just like I refine wisdom so that they mature in quality, something I cannot find either in courting and plondering because they are general term. I think plondering and courting are like you said a way of categorizing postive vs negative intention, but I have found more refined ways of having positive intentions than courting. Of course I don't pretend to be alone and that each has probably found better ways that works for each one of them.
That is why if I was courting the feminine energy, even though it would be with good intentions, I could have basic emotional needs fullfilled like affection, sex and things like that. But I wouldn't find what I am actually looking for that is higer vibrational relationship. Actually I put myself in the shoes of my opposite and for having been courted myself, I don't find it very pleasant so I would not do that to someone else if I do not enjoy it myself.
It is very situational but on most occasion I found that really deep and open contemplation with a strong feeling of awe to be the best way I can radiate love to creation rather than try to fix everything. I would also do that to myself. Not because I'd want to justify the way I am but because I would want to justify everything that is, out of love. I can find infinite beauty in distortions and that includes both mine and those of others and accept that the distortions others experience are chosen experience that I must respect and love for what they are and know that they will fall away when they are no longer needed.
The starving analogy is where the situation may get extreme enough that I know if I would not help my own self I would make the other suffer deeper than what it is here to be of catalyst. Like you said the starving person is itself the analogy. If I increase the catalyst for him instead of internalizing it to me, than I increase the separation and therefore increase the loop of pain for both of us and it is decided here in the present and not in the incarnation plan. It would be denial of myself and denial of catalyst. Denial of oneness. Of course the analogy is pushed to the extreme and I don't think most people face those kind of catalyst often. In most situations it could be very hard to tell if helping someone is really helpful. The debate would be personal I think. But I think the best way to know if a service is really a service is whether it increases or decreases seperation. There are probably also ways someone could be STO but be here to explore separation in which case it is possible someone's incarnation plan may APPEAR to take opportunity from separation but just be related to the lesson someone is here to learn. There is really no boundaries to relativity.
I guess some of the misunderstanding has been focused a lot on what courting means and forgive me for that, I was likely projecting personal favorite distortions of mine. But I realize now that in fact, the word is subject to personal interpretation just like tarot and is beside the point.
What I was trying to say is that for both situtations I think I have a personal way of doing things that I think is better for me than both courting and plundering. So it becomes somewhat irrelevant if it is better to plunder or court because I find I can do better than both. Not that I am better, but that I have a better way for me. Just like the worshiping you mention, one can choose between different subtle variations of putting creation on a pedestal, I think my way of praising creation would be better than worshiping if worshiping was the general term. In fact that's what I think my intuition has teached me, is that the best way I can do anything is never found on the general path. The best way I can be of service, the best way I can love, the best way I can radiate is not the way that seems obvious or the way that most people would use on an easy path therefore I must explore where there is still no paths. I don't think astrology defines me but I think it is funny I have 7x capricorn in my chart. It says I am not here for any easy path. I refine love just like I refine wisdom so that they mature in quality, something I cannot find either in courting and plondering because they are general term. I think plondering and courting are like you said a way of categorizing postive vs negative intention, but I have found more refined ways of having positive intentions than courting. Of course I don't pretend to be alone and that each has probably found better ways that works for each one of them.
That is why if I was courting the feminine energy, even though it would be with good intentions, I could have basic emotional needs fullfilled like affection, sex and things like that. But I wouldn't find what I am actually looking for that is higer vibrational relationship. Actually I put myself in the shoes of my opposite and for having been courted myself, I don't find it very pleasant so I would not do that to someone else if I do not enjoy it myself.
It is very situational but on most occasion I found that really deep and open contemplation with a strong feeling of awe to be the best way I can radiate love to creation rather than try to fix everything. I would also do that to myself. Not because I'd want to justify the way I am but because I would want to justify everything that is, out of love. I can find infinite beauty in distortions and that includes both mine and those of others and accept that the distortions others experience are chosen experience that I must respect and love for what they are and know that they will fall away when they are no longer needed.
The starving analogy is where the situation may get extreme enough that I know if I would not help my own self I would make the other suffer deeper than what it is here to be of catalyst. Like you said the starving person is itself the analogy. If I increase the catalyst for him instead of internalizing it to me, than I increase the separation and therefore increase the loop of pain for both of us and it is decided here in the present and not in the incarnation plan. It would be denial of myself and denial of catalyst. Denial of oneness. Of course the analogy is pushed to the extreme and I don't think most people face those kind of catalyst often. In most situations it could be very hard to tell if helping someone is really helpful. The debate would be personal I think. But I think the best way to know if a service is really a service is whether it increases or decreases seperation. There are probably also ways someone could be STO but be here to explore separation in which case it is possible someone's incarnation plan may APPEAR to take opportunity from separation but just be related to the lesson someone is here to learn. There is really no boundaries to relativity.